Eating Our Own

In addition to being a conservative, I'm a member of the West Virginia Republican Party. In fact, I currently serve as one of the party's Vice Chairmen, a regional political director for the upcoming State GOP Convention, and as Chair of the state party's Audit Committee. I've been actively involved with the state party since early 2001, and from that vantage point I have seen Republican party politics in West Virginia up close.

One of, if not the overriding, reason members of our party do not constitute a majority of elective officers in this state is that we eat our own. Republican primary elections are notorious for their divisiveness, and I always--always--go into a primary election cycle with the feeling of a pit in my stomach. This cycle is no different.

Why can't Republicans in West Virginia conduct a primary election campaign free of the kind of ugliness that divides the party for the general election? Why do some Republican campaigns seem intent on driving their party brethren onto the sidelines for the general election? The fact is, we are too small a group, in too small a state, to survive the kind of infighting that has marked us in the past.

Is there no such thing as good faith disagreement any longer? Are our intra-party opponents in a primary campaign to be dismissed simply as "drinking the kool-aid" if they support one candidate over another? Are we to trash another candidate based upon what church he attends? Or another based on whether he's divorced?

I'll be clear; this isn't just an internal Republican problem--there are too many instances of bad faith in politics; the current manufactured controversy over Rush Limbaugh is a prime example of bad faith opposition.

But keeping it in the Republican house, I think we've been so marginalized over the years--so politically abused and mistreated--that we've become conditioned to think that a victory in the primary is the best we can hope for. Like a line from the film "Braveheart" -- perhaps we are so used to eating the scraps from the table that we've forgotten we have a right to something better.

As the primary heats up, as we move toward the convention and the grassroots organizations begin to fill out and compete for delegate votes, I hope that every Republican involved with a campaign will think about the fact that the winner--whomever he is--will need every, single, last person affiliated with any of the Republican primary contenders if he expects to win in November, 2008. We're facing enough of an uphill climb as it is without driving away future supporters for after the primary.

I would hope that we would have learned better by now.