Nick Joe Rahall, West Virginia's representative from the Third Congressional District, recently introduced legislation in Congress to severely undermine the future of wind power in the United States. Basically he, like Mollohan who represents the First District, has developed a tender concern for the birds and bats that happen to find their way into the turbines and get themselves killed. The legislation will impose rigorous standards on turbines to presumably prevent animal deaths.
According to opensecrets.org, Congressman Rahall receives a tremendous amount of financial support from mining interests. In West Virginia that of course translates to coal. In the past few elections he has received support from the United Mine Workers and the Norfolk and Southern Railroad which relies on coal to generate a great deal of income. As for Mollohan, mining interests ranked tenth among his contributing industries. On the surface there is nothing wrong with these contributions. As for the coal industry, it not only "keeps the lights on" but tax receipts from it help the state pay to keep its lights from being turned off.
Doesn't it seem strange that Rahall and Mollohan feel such compassion for the little birds when you think about who gives them their support? Think about the miniscule amount of wildlife affected by wind farms. Now consider how many animals are killed when hollows are filled in by mountaintop removal waste. For that matter would the building unions and construction outfits that support both congressmen agree to never build tall structures again? After all more birds are killed by running into buildings. I doubt that they would ever oppose the outright hunting of birds.
The point here is NOT to oppose coal mining, hunting, construction, or any other worthwhile human endeavor that might kill a bird. We have to face the fact that human activities will sometimes kill animals directly or indirectly. Civilization will grind to a halt if we do not accept that our needs create some "collateral damage" in the natural world. These men's opposition may come less from their compassion for wildlife and more from some other source. Does someone fear that wind farms on the Allegheny Front might someday compete with coal? Do they just want to shore themselves up among their environutty constituents?
In any event the result of this proposed legislation will be to kill the prospect for a few good paying jobs, a decrease in the reliance on foreign energy, and increased local tax income to support our schools and other needs.
Friday, June 8, 2007
Thursday, June 7, 2007
One County's Frustration Could Be Another County's Opportunity
According to the Cumberland Times News the new shopping center once projected for a summer 2008 opening has hit more snags. Without going into specifics, the article indicated that the deal may be in trouble. At some point Target, Home Depot, and others must have determined that this region could support their business. The question is, has that changed or have other factors become obstacles?
The project was intended to resemble Morgantown's University Town Center which is an innovative way to develop rugged Appalachian terrain. A ridgetop supports the main anchor chains while terraces along the road to the top contain smaller stores and restaraunts. The businesses located there enjoy tremendous patronage, especially the restaraunt chains.
Whatever the problem is, Mineral County ought to aggressively investigate and determine if it can provide a less problematic option. If the anchor stores decided that this region cannot support them, fine. But if the problem lies in local government red tape, by all means go for the steal. Some argue that Mineral, Allegany, and Garrett Counties ought to cooperate to bring in business. However business located in Maryland does nothing to help Mineral County's tax base, meaning they continue to get more money for schools, police protection, and other services. If possible, our local leaders should at least investigate sweeping this development onto the correct side of the Potomac River.
The project was intended to resemble Morgantown's University Town Center which is an innovative way to develop rugged Appalachian terrain. A ridgetop supports the main anchor chains while terraces along the road to the top contain smaller stores and restaraunts. The businesses located there enjoy tremendous patronage, especially the restaraunt chains.
Whatever the problem is, Mineral County ought to aggressively investigate and determine if it can provide a less problematic option. If the anchor stores decided that this region cannot support them, fine. But if the problem lies in local government red tape, by all means go for the steal. Some argue that Mineral, Allegany, and Garrett Counties ought to cooperate to bring in business. However business located in Maryland does nothing to help Mineral County's tax base, meaning they continue to get more money for schools, police protection, and other services. If possible, our local leaders should at least investigate sweeping this development onto the correct side of the Potomac River.
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
The war on terror
63 years ago today on the beaches of Normandy Americans, Brits, Free French, & Canadians with support of others began the liberation of Europe. We fought fascism. We fought the Axis powers. We fought an enemy that wore uniforms and could be identified, and we carried it through to the end. In 2007 we are in a war on terrorism. Our enemy doesn't follow any rules, the don't wear uniforms and they are not easily identified.
Nobody in their right mind wants to be in a war. I want our troops to come home from Iraq as soon as possible, but we must win first. If we quit in Iraq, then we lose. General Omar Bradley stated "In war there is no prize for the runner-up." Quiting is not an option. "In War: Resolution" said Winston Churchill and our resolve is being tested now.
Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir remarked, "There can only be peace when they will start to love their children more than they hate us. " She knew well the terrorist that we fight today. How do you win against and enemy like that? An enemy that doesn't put the same value on human life that we do.
There are no easy answers to ending this war on terror. Abraham Lincoln was right, "The only good part of a war is its ending. " I know this; mistakes have been made both militarily and politically, but this is a war we must win in Iraq or in the future we fight in downtown America.
Nobody in their right mind wants to be in a war. I want our troops to come home from Iraq as soon as possible, but we must win first. If we quit in Iraq, then we lose. General Omar Bradley stated "In war there is no prize for the runner-up." Quiting is not an option. "In War: Resolution" said Winston Churchill and our resolve is being tested now.
Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir remarked, "There can only be peace when they will start to love their children more than they hate us. " She knew well the terrorist that we fight today. How do you win against and enemy like that? An enemy that doesn't put the same value on human life that we do.
There are no easy answers to ending this war on terror. Abraham Lincoln was right, "The only good part of a war is its ending. " I know this; mistakes have been made both militarily and politically, but this is a war we must win in Iraq or in the future we fight in downtown America.
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Whose Constitution?
One of the most dangerous trends in American law over the past several years lies in the blurring of the lines between citizen and non citizen. Maybe it is a failure of education that people for whatever reason assume that "Constitutional Rights" extend to anyone that happens to enter the jurisdiction of the United States.
Nationally the debate rages over detainees at Guantanamo Bay. People who ought to know better complain because those held there have been denied counsel, trial, and other legal remedies available to US citizens. Liberal judges (who are quickly overruled) support this nonsense to make a political statement against the president rather than ruling on the law. Closer to home, West Virginia law enforcement agencies have started distributing Miranda warnings in Spanish. No officer wants to work hard to get illegals off the street just so a liberal judge can wave a legal magic wand and give them Constitutional rights.
The Constitution's preamble has repeatedly been cited as part and parcel of the law of that document. This legal principle lay at the heart of every action taken by Abraham Lincoln to restore the Union. "We the people of the United States" opens the document. "The people" and "persons" used later on denotes United States citizens. Somewhere along the way, a segment of American thinkers has determined that our Constitution applies to those that sneak across our borders illegally. Even worse, they argue that enemies of our country that the military rounds up and detains have rights to our legal system. Imagine if Franklin Roosevelt had to deal with this foolishness when his FBI efficiently rounded up German agents at the commencement of World War II.
We cannot allow non citizens to take advantage of our benevolence. If you are not an American citizen, you do not receive the "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States." Those politicians that support extending legal protections, social services, and (I am not kidding here) voting rights to illegal non citizens ought to be held to account.
Nationally the debate rages over detainees at Guantanamo Bay. People who ought to know better complain because those held there have been denied counsel, trial, and other legal remedies available to US citizens. Liberal judges (who are quickly overruled) support this nonsense to make a political statement against the president rather than ruling on the law. Closer to home, West Virginia law enforcement agencies have started distributing Miranda warnings in Spanish. No officer wants to work hard to get illegals off the street just so a liberal judge can wave a legal magic wand and give them Constitutional rights.
The Constitution's preamble has repeatedly been cited as part and parcel of the law of that document. This legal principle lay at the heart of every action taken by Abraham Lincoln to restore the Union. "We the people of the United States" opens the document. "The people" and "persons" used later on denotes United States citizens. Somewhere along the way, a segment of American thinkers has determined that our Constitution applies to those that sneak across our borders illegally. Even worse, they argue that enemies of our country that the military rounds up and detains have rights to our legal system. Imagine if Franklin Roosevelt had to deal with this foolishness when his FBI efficiently rounded up German agents at the commencement of World War II.
We cannot allow non citizens to take advantage of our benevolence. If you are not an American citizen, you do not receive the "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States." Those politicians that support extending legal protections, social services, and (I am not kidding here) voting rights to illegal non citizens ought to be held to account.
Monday, June 4, 2007
The Price of Government Intervention
In the past few months we have seen gas prices jump to their highest levels since Hurricane Katrina hit. Consumers scramble to find ways to pay the price while others scramble to lay blame. Plenty of explanation exists for this most recent spike.
First is the problem of blends. Different environmental regulations for different parts of the country mean that gasoline refineries must produce a vast array of gasoline formulas, then must figure out the supply and demand for each version sent out over the country. Personally I wonder why they do not simply go with the most environmentally friendly formula for the whole nation.
Secondly, refining in the United States is almost an endangered species. Our domestic capacity has not expanded in decades due to the expensive and time consuming permit process combined with legions of environmental groups waiting to sue. Meanwhile current facilities continue to age and occasionally blow up. Increasingly we rely on foreign countries such as Mexico and Venezuela to help provide the fuel we need. The most recent price rises reflect fears that unless a short term reduction in consumption takes place, shortages will occur in some parts of the country. Yes oil companies profit from this and it is hard to work up much sympathy for them, but it is a market tool to ensure a continued supply everywhere.
Right now the supply of crude does not pose a problem. Actually oil prices have dropped recently due to increases in supply primarily from Saudi Arabia. That nation's authorities just foiled a major plot to destroy its oil facilities. We need stable domestic sources of oil and no reason exists to not tap reserves in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. In his infinite wisdom, President Carter created this sprawling reserve to prevent oil companies from drilling there, citing the potential danger to polar bear and reindeer habitats. Of course the presence of cities, interstate highways, coal mines, etc. have absolutely driven away the population of black bear and white tail deer from our region. We simply need more domestic supply in case of international turmoil.
Some want to blame the long term energy consumption of the United States, citing familiar statistics that say we use more than any other nation. This represents a typical example of America bashing with no suggested alternative. Environmentalists fail to point out that the US produces more goods and services more efficiently than any other nation. We use more because we produce more, but America also wastes less. The inefficient authoritarian Chinese economy among others wastes more energy due to their much lower productivity level.
As has been pointed out here before, that capability comes from the genius of competitive capitalism. In that philosophy lies the key to solving energy price problems. Governor Manchin called upon the president to declare a state of emergency, a move that would create panic and huge price hikes. He also asked Bush to create a national energy strategy, a policy that the president has attempted repeatedly and received no support. If the governor and others actually want an energy policy they must meet with President Bush, leave politics at the door, and work out a solution. For our economic stability and national security we need to free American industry to produce more in America for Americans.
First is the problem of blends. Different environmental regulations for different parts of the country mean that gasoline refineries must produce a vast array of gasoline formulas, then must figure out the supply and demand for each version sent out over the country. Personally I wonder why they do not simply go with the most environmentally friendly formula for the whole nation.
Secondly, refining in the United States is almost an endangered species. Our domestic capacity has not expanded in decades due to the expensive and time consuming permit process combined with legions of environmental groups waiting to sue. Meanwhile current facilities continue to age and occasionally blow up. Increasingly we rely on foreign countries such as Mexico and Venezuela to help provide the fuel we need. The most recent price rises reflect fears that unless a short term reduction in consumption takes place, shortages will occur in some parts of the country. Yes oil companies profit from this and it is hard to work up much sympathy for them, but it is a market tool to ensure a continued supply everywhere.
Right now the supply of crude does not pose a problem. Actually oil prices have dropped recently due to increases in supply primarily from Saudi Arabia. That nation's authorities just foiled a major plot to destroy its oil facilities. We need stable domestic sources of oil and no reason exists to not tap reserves in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. In his infinite wisdom, President Carter created this sprawling reserve to prevent oil companies from drilling there, citing the potential danger to polar bear and reindeer habitats. Of course the presence of cities, interstate highways, coal mines, etc. have absolutely driven away the population of black bear and white tail deer from our region. We simply need more domestic supply in case of international turmoil.
Some want to blame the long term energy consumption of the United States, citing familiar statistics that say we use more than any other nation. This represents a typical example of America bashing with no suggested alternative. Environmentalists fail to point out that the US produces more goods and services more efficiently than any other nation. We use more because we produce more, but America also wastes less. The inefficient authoritarian Chinese economy among others wastes more energy due to their much lower productivity level.
As has been pointed out here before, that capability comes from the genius of competitive capitalism. In that philosophy lies the key to solving energy price problems. Governor Manchin called upon the president to declare a state of emergency, a move that would create panic and huge price hikes. He also asked Bush to create a national energy strategy, a policy that the president has attempted repeatedly and received no support. If the governor and others actually want an energy policy they must meet with President Bush, leave politics at the door, and work out a solution. For our economic stability and national security we need to free American industry to produce more in America for Americans.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)