It was supposed to be the Johnny Manziel Show, but the talk of this year's NFL Draft will center around openly gay University of Missouri pass rushing specialist Michael Sam. His carefully prepared rollout of a public acknowledgment included placed stories in choice outlets designed to spark questions and, most of all, buzz. Questions and speculation runs the spectrum from where will he be drafted to whether he will be accepted.
First of all, plain and simple, if Michael Sam has NFL talent, he will get an opportunity.
At 6'2, weighing 255, his height could be an issue. Ideally, NFL squads like pass rushers with more length than Sam offers. He, however, excelled in the Southeastern Conference against NFL ready linemen. If anyone had any questions about whether or not he has NFL talent, this fact alone answers it.
The bigger question is if he will be accepted in an NFL locker room. Also, how will his team handle the blistering press attention? Some compare his possible entrance to Jackie Robinson, others see loose similarities with Tim Tebow and even Manti Teo.
Former NFL linebacker Lavar Arrington on his drive time show in Washington DC's WJFK insisted that Sam faced many of the same pressures and potentially much of the same hostility as Robinson. The most vulgar in opposing fanbases will never let him forget his sexuality. Then again, you also have the viral video of a Jets fan from last season screaming for his own team's quarterback to tear his ACL. Fans will be fans. Sam will get the taunts, no doubt. Certainly they will sting in a way that no one outside of his situation could imagine.
No one can predict how a specific locker room might react, but certainly executives do fear the scrutiny and potential issues.
That is why Sam will likely be drafted lower than he should, but will most likely end up with a winning organization.
Winning organizations generally forbid chaotic locker rooms. Witness the report on the hapless Miami Dolphins that described continual meltdown over several years. Remember how Tim Tebow, personally the least offensive player one can imagine, polarized the locker room of the New York Jets. Extra attention for non football attributes can rub people the wrong way, particularly on a losing team. No matter whether the player is gay, an evangelical Christian, or a famed balloon artist, there will be jealousy.
Winning organizations establish professionalism. Players and coaches do not become automatons, but they do have a clear understanding of what they can and cannot do or say. They want to stay with a winner, so they conduct themselves accordingly. So Sam will likely end up playing for one of those well-established winners like the New England Patriots, Pittsburgh Steelers, or San Francisco 49ers. Winning stems from a professional attitude established at the top. They also specialize in handling the press and putting public attention in its proper place.
And that would be the best possible outcome. On a team like the Steelers or the Patriots, Sam simply becomes a player doing his job. That was certainly not his intention when his people orchestrated his announcement, but that would be the best result for both Sam and whatever team drafts him moving forward.
Showing posts with label New England Patriots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New England Patriots. Show all posts
Friday, February 21, 2014
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
Gangs Are Associations of Weakness
Initial reports of the arrest of former New England Patriots tight end Aaron Hernandez included hints of a dark shadow life. Certain tattoos on his body may or may not advertise gang affiliations. The 23 year old Hernandez denies them. Gang unit investigators have yet to confirm it one way or the other.
If true, it brings a new angle to the disturbing world of gangs. They are supposed to be creatures of poverty. Those who do make money in them do so as criminals, making it hard to jump to a legitimate lifestyle. Even rappers feel the need to maintain some connection "to the streets" to keep up their "street cred", whatever that is worth to those gunned down as a consequence.
Hernandez, again, if he does have affiliations, would be a young man, educated in a highly respected university, who made his money completely free of the gang life. Yet he still may have found living in that style preferable to finding new friends, new hangouts, and a responsible path forward.
Gang violence increased over a recent ten year period, but decreased slightly between 2008 and 2010, according to the FBI.
Cultural perceptions of gangs, from Italian organized crime "families" to the street variety, range from portraying them as scum of the earth to representatives of tarnished virtue. Almost nowhere, however, does one see the people involved as inherently weak.
It's hard to blame some kids for getting involved. Living in dangerous neighborhoods, some kids might seek out a gang to make them feel secure. If it cannot protect them at all times, it can at least avenge any insult or assault. But joining for that reason is a decision borne of weakness, even if one cannot blame the kid for being vulnerable in the first place.
Most gang violence occurs when a large group from gang A finds a smaller group or an individual of a rival gang and attacks. Sneak, or surprise attacks are common. The tactic is to stack the odds to reduce the possibility of harm to the attackers. These reflect modes of fighting common in guerrilla warfare, especially when the number of proven and capable fighters is limited. Stonewall Jackson, with his usually smaller army, preferred to bring his entire force to bear on an isolated extension of his opponents' lines.
But these tactics are a reflection of weakness, regardless of the violent results.
Criminal enterprises also confess a lack of strength. Gangs gain revenues by combining entrepreneurial skill with enough force to create a limited geographical monopoly.
Again, this is weakness. They fear the risk and reward process of the truly competitive free market. Being a criminal, rather than a businessman, enables one to bring force to bear. Being a better businessman is hard. Killing your competition or threatening their families is relatively easier.
But it is still, from a business standpoint, a tactic of weakness, a confession that the individual could not "hack it" in the "real world."
Purveyors of popular culture could strike a blow against violence by making sure that movies about gangs and their lifestyle teach that those involved are essentially weak individuals. Martin Scorcese's Good Fellas portrayed gangsters as anything but good, which gives it a positive message. How many other films (or for that matter, Bio channel documentaries) about the Mafia or street gangs even include that element?
If guilty of his crimes, Aaron Hernandez was a thoroughly weak individual regardless of whether or not he was in a gang. What insult to his soul was worth one or more lives? What good did it do him to commit one of the most stupidly executed murders in some time? Despite his physical strength and his football field prowess, Aaron Hernandez was likely a very weak man.
Just the kind of person perfect for a gang.
If true, it brings a new angle to the disturbing world of gangs. They are supposed to be creatures of poverty. Those who do make money in them do so as criminals, making it hard to jump to a legitimate lifestyle. Even rappers feel the need to maintain some connection "to the streets" to keep up their "street cred", whatever that is worth to those gunned down as a consequence.
Hernandez, again, if he does have affiliations, would be a young man, educated in a highly respected university, who made his money completely free of the gang life. Yet he still may have found living in that style preferable to finding new friends, new hangouts, and a responsible path forward.
Gang violence increased over a recent ten year period, but decreased slightly between 2008 and 2010, according to the FBI.
Cultural perceptions of gangs, from Italian organized crime "families" to the street variety, range from portraying them as scum of the earth to representatives of tarnished virtue. Almost nowhere, however, does one see the people involved as inherently weak.
It's hard to blame some kids for getting involved. Living in dangerous neighborhoods, some kids might seek out a gang to make them feel secure. If it cannot protect them at all times, it can at least avenge any insult or assault. But joining for that reason is a decision borne of weakness, even if one cannot blame the kid for being vulnerable in the first place.
Most gang violence occurs when a large group from gang A finds a smaller group or an individual of a rival gang and attacks. Sneak, or surprise attacks are common. The tactic is to stack the odds to reduce the possibility of harm to the attackers. These reflect modes of fighting common in guerrilla warfare, especially when the number of proven and capable fighters is limited. Stonewall Jackson, with his usually smaller army, preferred to bring his entire force to bear on an isolated extension of his opponents' lines.
But these tactics are a reflection of weakness, regardless of the violent results.
Criminal enterprises also confess a lack of strength. Gangs gain revenues by combining entrepreneurial skill with enough force to create a limited geographical monopoly.
Again, this is weakness. They fear the risk and reward process of the truly competitive free market. Being a criminal, rather than a businessman, enables one to bring force to bear. Being a better businessman is hard. Killing your competition or threatening their families is relatively easier.
But it is still, from a business standpoint, a tactic of weakness, a confession that the individual could not "hack it" in the "real world."
Purveyors of popular culture could strike a blow against violence by making sure that movies about gangs and their lifestyle teach that those involved are essentially weak individuals. Martin Scorcese's Good Fellas portrayed gangsters as anything but good, which gives it a positive message. How many other films (or for that matter, Bio channel documentaries) about the Mafia or street gangs even include that element?
If guilty of his crimes, Aaron Hernandez was a thoroughly weak individual regardless of whether or not he was in a gang. What insult to his soul was worth one or more lives? What good did it do him to commit one of the most stupidly executed murders in some time? Despite his physical strength and his football field prowess, Aaron Hernandez was likely a very weak man.
Just the kind of person perfect for a gang.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)