Thursday, October 4, 2007

Dignity

During George Washington's first term as president, his old friend Governor Morris of New York came to the capital city to visit. Washington's close adviser, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, met Morris on the street. Morris asked where he could find Washington, who happened to be strolling away from them down the street as they spoke. Hamilton told Morris that President Washington would like nothing better than for his old pal to come up behind him, slap him on the back and jovially greet him.

Morris did just that, earning a stare from Washington that must have frozen his very soul. Washington then walked on without a word. When he looked back at Hamilton, he saw his fellow New Yorker laughing uproariously at the practical joke he just pulled. George Washington understood that as president an individual must show not only ability, but also dignity.

Where has that dignity gone? The Democratic presidential candidates seem to have lost all pretense to it, subjecting themselves to online debacles. Questions are asked in ridiculous ways. Certainly the famous "boxers or briefs" question posed to Clinton was a milestone in the loss of respect for the presidential office, then again so was the scandal of Watergate.

That being said, dignified is as dignified does. Despite the avalanche of satire, most of it extremely trite and shallow, directed at the current president, few can argue that George W. Bush does not handle himself with dignity. He expects respect and gets it as well as any president in the past hundred years. The Republican frontrunner's Fred Thompson and Rudolph Giuliani have acted similarly, not exposing themselves to silly requests. Credit Hillary Clinton with at least looking uncomfortable in the situations in which the Democrats expect her to perform.

Certainly we must expect our presidents to conduct themselves with strength. We must also understand that a certain amount of personal dignity is necessary to maintain respect. These men and women are not here to sell used cars, but to lead the free world. Republicans understand this, Democrats at this point do not.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Cleaning Up

Last Thursday's meeting of the Mineral County Clean Up Committee showed major differences between the two sides over the proposed future ordinance.

The basic difference lies in the scope of the law to be written. Gary Howell and others have argued over a period of months for a tightly written and strictly defined law. The ideal law for the Howell side restricts the power of government. If a structure or the condition of a property affects the health and safety of neighbors then the county ought to have the authority to act. Just having a property that someone deems as "junky" should not be a basis for government action.

The law must respect the basic rights of property owners. It must not encourage using the government for the purposes of harassment. Substantial penalties for noncompliance, up to $100 per day, have been suggested. This penalty could violate the US Constitutional prohibition on excessive fines. It certainly would prevent most honest citizens from using a natural right of appeal when they might have a legitimate issue with enforcement. Any major fine ought not be assessed until the entire appeals process has been exhausted. Protections for the disabled, poor and elderly must be specifically included.

The opposing side calls for a broadly based law that assigns more power to the county government. Additional powers come from the construct of the law that leaves such terms as "overgrown vegetation" undefined. Without strict guidelines, such issues become very subjective depending upon the attitude of investigators and the Enforcement Board. Committee member Kolin Jan even suggested that when the appearance of a property offended a businessman from outside the region, that he ought to be able to file a complaint against the owner, citing an "adverse effect" on economic development. How many of us have properties that would meet the aesthetic standard of a big city businessman?

Another issue lies in the well-known fact that politicians do not always act in accordance with ethical standards or even the law itself. Members of the committee denied that reasonable and honest public officials would ever abuse this law. And they would not. Mineral County's current officials are honest and trustworthy people, but they will not always be in office. The history of West Virginia demonstrates that all too often, elected officials do not follow the law. West Virginia elected officials have been known to take bribes, misappropriate federal and state funds, commit voter fraud, intimidate witnesses, one even bit a citizen in the nose. With this record, citizens are wise to prevent much power from falling into government hands.

The cold fact is that those that want broad powers and sweeping language in this ordinance could win unless the public speaks. Citizens concerned about their rights need to inform committee members such as Gary Howell that they want their rights protected. Additionally, they need to let the county commission know how they feel. This government body will have final say over the creation of the law. I know a lot of folks are worried about this, they need to speak loudly and often between now and teh next meeting. Make your voice heard.


Tuesday, October 2, 2007

The Value of People Behind the Scenes

As we approach another important election cycle, we will hear more than we ever wanted to about the candidates. Their faces will dominate the news shows and their spin will consume endless advertising dollars. Candidates whether for president or county commission will travel all over, meeting people, discussing the issues. It's easy to forget that behind each candidate, organizing each campaign, are the men and women behind the scenes.

How does that candidate know the local history of some tiny little town? Why does it seem like another candidate has an amazing ability to discuss every conceivable issue? Of course the candidates themselves are usually pretty sharp. However even the best candidates need help.

Some operate firms that help advise candidates and organize their approach. They specialize in efficiency, publicity, and actually saving campaigns money. One such firm is Abernathy Strategies run by Gary Abernathy. Others volunteer to work for the party itself. Perhaps a lot of voters have not yet heard of New Creek resident Christy Barnett, but the West Virginia State Republican Party valued her tireless energy and organizational skill enough to name her to its State Executive Committee in the past year. Barnett has shown a strong ability to get politicians on the west side of the mountains (especially in Charleston) interested in this region. Without the unpaid labor of people such as Barnett, candidates will not enjoy success.

Just as important are the thousands of conservatives that care enough to play whatever part they can. Some trudge valiantly into areas such as the notoriously left wing Morgantown neighborhood of South Park to get belittled for hours. Others drive out country roads to pass out literature, spending a lot of dollars and hours because they care about their community, state, and country. This is why some get extremely disappointed when elected officials do not measure up; they didn't just get a vote, they got a huge measure of a person's time for a few months.

West Virginia's Republican Party is gearing up yet again for an exciting political season. This will be a tremendous year in terms of candidates for office at all levels. Mineral County, for example, is very lucky to have extremely experienced men and women running for Delegate and State Senate. Even as we give these hard working candidates their just due, we must also remember the people that work behind the scenes that make victory possible.


Monday, October 1, 2007

"Commedians" and Jesus

I had no idea who Kathy Griffin was until this week. Nor did I care. I still don't really care, but now I know who she is and maybe that is the whole point.

At an awards show recently, alleged commedienne Kathy Griffin went on a rant attacking of all people Jesus Christ. Predictably it made national news. Mission accomplished for Kathy Griffin, we all know who she is. Unfortunately the majority of Americans likely dislike her and will avoid whatever she does at all costs.

Every time a famous individual attacks Jesus Christ, they always come away looking silly. The fact that fools such as Griffin see Christ as a figure worthy of attack demonstrates the power He has. People such as this sad woman understand on some level the power of His influence, so they realize that attacking Christ buys them cheap attention.

As to the power of commedians, it is rare that anyone takes them seriously. It is rare enough anymore that modern comics get real laughs from real jokes. Instead they resort to statements that rely on shock value rather than genuine humor. The best commedians, such as Bill Cosby of an earlier time and "Larry he Cable Guy" today relate stories based on shared experiences. We understand Cosby's old (respectful) religious humor and stories of his family. Larry the Cable Guy taps into the shared experiences of rural life in America. CBS' 60 Minutes recently profiled him. They did a good job of showing just how confused the entertainment industry was about his success(of course his producer comes from West Virginia.)

Both of these comic figures share a definite confidence in their lives and performances. They are strong and (at least until Cosby's son died) fairly happy looking people. It also is not shocking that both tend to support more traditional American values. Other commedians, such as Griffin, share neurotic and depressed outlooks on life that may have something to do with their reliance on negativity and shock value.

When comedy is at its best, we are all in on the joke and we laugh. Shocking statements masquerading as comedy with no other discernable purpose reveal a shallow mind and a hollow spirit.

Friday, September 28, 2007

A National Energy Policy

Since the first oil crisis of the 1970 we have known that our Achilles Heal is energy. In the 30 plus years since the first crisis, the power has shifted back and forth between both parties. During that time neither party has come up with a viable solution. Recent statements from the governor show that has not changed. "I've spoken to most of the presidential candidates on both the Republican and Democratic sides," Governor Joe Manchin stated at the Bluefield Coal Show. "They know what I'm saying. But none come out with a true energy policy."

West Virginia has coal, gas, wind, and water to generate energy for the nation. If a lead is not going to be taken anytime soon on a national level, then the state must step forward and take the lead. We should be reforming our laws to allow easier construction of modern power plants that will use West Virginia coal to produce power in the state and provide much needed jobs in the state.

The political landscape of West Virginia hurts the very industries that we need to grow. The current system put in place by the Democratic controlled WV Legislature holds back our economic growth. We must reform the legal and tax structure to encourage growth in the energy producing industries. In its current form, the WV legislature will not make the necessary changes to bring economic growth to this sector. We need to make some serious changes in West Virginia and take advantage of our strong points, or we will continue to fall behind the other states.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

New York City's Ninja Bandit Would Have a Short Career in West Virginia

Fox News reported September 25th on a crime wave striking fear into the lives of residents of Staten Island. Apparently a man enters homes dressed as a ninja, assaults residents with numchuks, and steals their property. Some have been slightly injured, but it is unknown whether the level of violence will escalate. The "Ninja Bandit" has struck seventeen separate homes.

Does anyone think that this man would strike seventeen different homes in West Virginia? Probably not. Bringing numchuks to a gunfight is not a prudent measure. As a matter of fact the ninja bandit would probably find some better way of spending his energy.

New York City for many years now, whether it be during Democratic or Republican administrations, has consistently discouraged law abiding citizens from owning firearms. The city government aggressively pushed for the legal right to sue gun manufacturers for the misuse of their product.

Has anyone ever suggested that automobile manufacturers be similarly treated if a driver is drunk, or uses the car for some illegal purpose? Absolutely not because it sounds ludicrous. However driving an automobile is considered a legal privilege, not a constitutional right. Despite the arguments of extremists, the Second Amendment exists so that armed citizens can protect themselves from dictatorial tyranny, their country from invasion, and their property from intruders. These rights extend back centuries in British and American law.


Gun rights' opponents have adopted what Stalin called "salami tactics," that is slicing away a little bit at a time. Gun rights groups such as the National Rifle Association are well aware of this and fight strongly any attempt to restrict our constitutional rights here. If we believe in freedom, we must all take a stand and support everyone's right to defend themselves with a handgun, if necessary.


After all, next time the ninja bandit strikes, it could be a vulnerable senior citizen. Without a handgun for protection, such a person would stand no chance against an intruder. If that happens, the victim's family can thank New York City leadership over the past few decades for aggressively tearing down their right to defend themselves


Wednesday, September 26, 2007

West Virginia GOP Convention Details

On what is being termed "Tsunami Tuesday", February 5, 2008, West Virginia Republicans will open a new chapter in the state's political life with the state's first-ever Presidential Nominating Convention. At the Charleston Civic Center, over 1400 delegates from across the state will gather to award a presidential candidate West Virginia's at-large delegates to the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

One significant milestone in the convention calendar was reached on September 1; ten candidates, including all four "first tier" candidates, registered with the West Virginia Republican Party to participate in the convention. Now, the process turns to delegate selection.

Delegates to the state convention are selected in three ways; first, all voting members of the State Executive Committee, including county chairmen, are delegates. Second, each county executive committee names 12 delegates from among their number to serve as delegates. If a county committee has less than 12 members, that committee may name others to fill those slots. Finally, each county is awarded additional delegates based upon the number of registered Republicans in the county, with a further bonus for counties where President Bush won a majority of the vote in 2004.

The delegates based upon Republican registration, and those based upon voting for Bush in '04, are elected by the public. The election of delegates by the public has two components; first, an on-line vote. If someone wishes to vote for their county's delegates on-line, they must contact state party headquarters in Charleston between October 1, 2007 and November 30, 2007 to register. They will receive a secure username and password to use when they cast their vote between January 1 and January 14, 2008. The second component to the vote is the optional "county caucus". The county chair in each county decides whether to have a caucus, at which Republicans can vote for the delegates from their county. The caucuses must be held between January 1 and January 15, 2008, and anyone who has registered to vote online is ineligible to vote at the county caucus.

If someone is interested in running for delegate to Charleston, they have to file a certificate of candidacy with the state party between November 1 and November 30, 2008 and pay a $25 registration fee. Those fees will in large measure cover the expenses of the convention. Candidates for delegate can declare a presidential candidate preference, in which case the preference will appear beside that candidate's name on the county ballot.

In all, the state convention format represents a dramatic departure from past methods of selecting delegates to the national convention. Gone are the days of endless primary ballots with the names of dozens--or more--who want to go to the national convention. This new method promises to be simpler, more interactive, and more rewarding to those campaigns who have the best organizational skills--not necessarily the most money.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Bring Back Insane Assylums As Soon As Possible

There are a lot of sick people out there. A lot. Just today the following headlines have appeared on the Fox News website.

Details Emerge in WVa Torture Case

Girl, 6, Hanged to Death Was Sexually Assaulted

Woman Attacked With Sword in Argument Over Puppy

That is just the tip of the iceberg. Sick and brutal crimes happen every day with increasing frequency. Our problem as a nation is that the criminal justice system can only punish these people after they commit crimes. Some crimes reflect a condition of addiction, others represent a cry for help. Many times, even the most brutal acts occur after the offender has repeatedly told people that they were sick and needed help.

Thirty years ago mental health advocates succeeded in transforming America's mental care system. Decades ago the mentally ill were sent to long term care hospitals such as those in Weston and Spencer. Often times care was below standards and treatment was spotty. On the other hand a large number of people received some kind of medical attention and were off the streets.

Advocates opened up the hospitals on the assumption that better medication and part time facilities could treat the mentally ill better. States more than willingly unloaded themselves of the burden of maintaining hospitals. Instead of leading to a better life for the mentally ill, these changes made their lives more hellish.

Sure states no longer maintain as many costly hospitals, but too many of the mentally ill wind up in jail. They know what they did was wrong so they do not qualify as criminally insane. Yet they are mentally ill according to the definitions of psychologists. We have seen an explosion of jail construction to house these people.

Not only do we incarcerate more mentally ill, we also see more of them simply wandering the streets. They lack a firm grasp on how to live a normal life, so their only option lies in wandering from shelter to shelter or living in a box. All too often many turn to lives of drug addiction and/or violence.

The mental health experiment has failed miserably. We must work to rebuild state hospitals so that we can get addicts, psychopaths, pedophiles, and other people dangerous to themselves or others off the streets and into facilities where they at least have a chance to change. This is not a foot in the door to socialized medicine, it only returns to an earlier mode of dealing with a major problem in society. Enough is enough. Get mentally ill people off the streets before they can rape children or murder for drug money.

Monday, September 24, 2007

But How Do You Replace Them?

That's the big question when it comes to the issue of ridding the United States of illegal labor. Businesses and activists both contend that illegal aliens' work in such industries as agriculture and meat packing are essential. Without the labor that works at such low incomes, America's food supply could be at risk.

Actually the presence of a group of workers laboring for such low wages undercuts the natural economic process. Let's take lettuce harvesting, for instance. Lettuce costs $1 per head, every single one picked by hand. Lately we have seen that laborers will occasionally contaminate lettuce by doing business better conducted elsewhere right there in the field. It is argued that this labor is absolutely necessary to get lettuce harvested and sent to market.

Reliance on cheap labor that works not only below prevailing, but also legal wages has retarded economic development. Now I am not equating illegal alien labor to slavery, that would insult the memory of those that had to live under that curse of stolen liberty. However in the case of the South, the entire region's industrial development stalled in part because it was cheaper to rely on slave labor than to try and develop efficient industrial solutions.

Many in agribusiness will try to maintain that the labor is essential. However, the cheapness of the labor has prevented the industry from mechanizing. You cannot tell me that two hundred years ago we could invent a machine to pick seeds from cotton balls, but we cannot invent today one that harvests lettuce. Research, development, and production of such machines would put American technicians, managers, salespeople, and many others to work while simultaneously reducing the overall cost of harvesting lettuce.

USA Today proclaimed on its front page today that immigrant groups are trying to put more intense pressure on lawmakers and business to legalize more aliens and to not cut off benefits. They are mobilizing for strikes and boycotts. So be it. Americans, most of whom have family ties to people that came here legally, are fed up with this issue. It is time to solve the problem. Cut off social benefits, and most importantly, jobs to those that are not here legally.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Romney Wins Michigan Republican Straw Poll

Mitt Romney, Republican candidate for President and former Governor of Massachusetts, won Sunday's straw poll of attendees at the Michigan Republican Leadership Conference at Mackinac Island. Governor Romney polled decisively ahead of other candidates for president, carrying nearly 40% of the vote.

The Results are:

Romney — 39.12%
McCain — 26.56%
Paul — 10.83%
Giuliani — 10.62%
F. Thompson — 7.15%
Huckabee — 2.55%
Hunter — 1.23%
Tancredo — 0%
Brownback — 0.31%

Friday, September 21, 2007

Give Washington, DC back to Maryland?

A recent article in the Baltimore Sun says that Washington, DC should be given representation in Congress. I disagree it should be given independent representation.

The District of Columbia is the nations capital and in 1791 when its location was decided it was also decided it would be independent of the states. Originally the District of Columbia was set up at a 10 mile by 10 mile section of land along the Potomac carved out of both Virginia and Maryland. Washington County, DC was located on the Maryland portion, and Arlington County, DC was located on the Virginia portion.

The people that choose to live in the District of Columbia know they give up certain rights by choosing to live in a Federal District instead of a state. Everybody currently living in the District live there by choice, so they are willing giving up those rights.

The founding fathers did not want any state to hold the capital of the nation. I still believe that is a good idea. If the citizens of the District of Columbia want representation in Congress, then I believe the choice is simple. On July 9, 1846 Arlington County, DC was returned to the state of Virginia from which is was carved. The people in Arlington were then represented in Congress as part of the state of Virginia.

The same could be done now to give the people of Washington, DC representation in Congress. Simply return the Washington County portion of the District back to Maryland. They would then have representation in Congress without creating new Senate and House seats.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

But....Why???

Article Beyond Delay, The 22 most corupt members of Congress

Why are we continuing to elect such a man? Do we want this state to continue to be a state of dependency? Waiting for the next politician to dump a few dollars in the trough? What happens when the endless stream of cash runs out with the next election?

Why are conservatives still holding to their registration as Democracts? Does voting in the Democrat primary still outweigh the desire to make known that this state is a Conservative, family values upholding state?

How long will the great benefactor KKKeep funneling money in and right back out of our state?

Is it fair for an active politician to name any and every public structure after himself? Do I want to run against Robert C. Byrd when most of my constituents have to go into *** Byrd high scholl to cast a vote? Confused as to which Namesake High School I am referring to? Just take the Robert C. Byrd Highway system, exit at the Robert C. Byrd interchange, ask the kid on a field trip, in the RCB t-shirt standing at the statue of the Honorable Robert C. Byrd in the state house where to go. Am I the only person to wonder about the future of our state in the post-RCB era? And why is everything named after a politician who is still in office running campaigns every six years? How is that fair?

Serious questions awaiting some serious answers.

I was an auditor for ISR (Institute for Scientifc Research) as a Toothman Rice, PLLC staff member. Of course that was before the architectural marval they built next to the NASA facility in Fairmont, WV. By the way I was able to tour NASA's over-planned facility (I say that because a huge floor area was planned for super computers that were quickly reduced to 1/20th of the size alloted for the servers which equals empty, wasted floor space...thanks Mr and Mrs Tax Payer) that, according to my high level escort, was built, sold to WVU for $1 then leased back to NASA for annual rent (again, thank you Mr and Mrs Taxpayer, I hope you have budgeted for this and other projects like Jesse Jackson, Jr.'s "future" airport.

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.'s Airport Earmark , afterall, we are going to need those work-projects down the road to keep this economy rolling!). Feel free to re-read that last one to make sure you got it...I wrote it and had to re-read it several times.

What struck me most is that the charges cited in this article are likely considered IMMATERIAL. That means that the budget for said NON-profit is TOO BIG to worry about 10K here or 10K there. Under a pre-specified threshold, it didn' t warrant investigation. So, of course, twin 60 inch plasma TVs in the conference room were necessary for ISR, as were the EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE curtains in the CEO's office (of course they may have been twin 50 inch plasmas, not 60 inch as my memory seems to recall). Upon questioning, I was commended for being so thorough as to discover 3 plasma TV charges, but only 2 registered TVs, then the whole thing was ignored because one was "faulty" and, afterall, the price tag was not a material amount to be considered., even though it was probably half that of the average persons annual income for the are...per TV!!! Without any further evidence it was swept aside because, after all, it was immaterial.

Let me close with this question, how many immaterial charges does it take to make one material charge? (remember not to add them together because each incident is a unique occurence...!) Said another way, who is going to guarantee that the "State of Dependency" created by Senator Byrd and his fellow Democrats will continue when Mr Byrd decides to no longer serve as the Senator for our great state? Can a well-respected...er...uh...honest...er...uh...incorru...er uh...current member of Congress keep the dollars flowing? Let's start planning for the future of this state or we may no longer be "OPEN".

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Taylor County Commission fighting TrAIL 500 kV line

In a meeting last Tuesday, the Taylor County Commission voted 3-0 to oppose the "Grafton Area Route", a proposed alternative route for the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line project -- a 500kV electric transmission line which will run from southwestern Pennsylvania to northern Virginia.

The "Grafton Area Route" proposal came about after local residents in Monongalia and Preston counties strenuously opposed the original proposed route of the line, which would cut through the Halleck and Gladesville areas of Mon and Preston County, respectively. The WV Public Service Commission's Consumer Advocate Division ordered an alternative route study, and the Grafton Area Route is the result of that study.

The Grafton Area Route would, generally, follow the route of the existing Ft. Martin-Pruntytown line. It would then cut through the Wickwire area of Taylor County, before meeting up with the Pruntytown-Mt. Storm line; the right of way for the Grafton Area Route would more or less parallel the existing line.

The Grafton Area Route, in every measurable way according to the study, will have a greater negative impact upon people and the environment than the original proposed route. For example, the Grafton Area Route may require the removal of at least one residence, while the original route does not threaten any structures. In addition, the Grafton Area Route will place the lines within 250 feet of nearly 100 residences, while the original route will similarly affect less than 50. Add to that the additional economic and environmental costs, and the Grafton Area Route appears to be an inferior choice to the original proposed route.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

American Troops Continue Their Hard Work Worldwide (no thanks to the liberal media)

This week, Congress has grilled General David Petraeus, as well as other high level officials. Republicans have generally sought reassurance, as one put it, that there is light at the end of the tunnel. The expected announcement of troop cutbacks comes as welcome news, but war supporters increasingly call for some idea of when Iraq will be ready for us to leave.
Democrats of course came out with their knives sharpened. Many of them almost gleefully (including some of their presidential candidates) too the opportunity to criticize without offering their own ideas. This is all too familiar territory for liberals. They attack without offering solutions of substance. They know that running away won't deter America's enemies, but it's much more important to try and win the next election.

It is interesting that the liberal media hangs on the words of a few retired generals that have not set foot in Iraq if they are critical, but ignore the facts given by the guy that has been there doing the job.

Moving Iraq into the next phase will require a massive investment in intelligence capabilities. When President Jimmy Carter pulled many of our human resources off the ground in the Middle East, he destroyed decades of work. We still have not restored our former capabilities there and reap the consequences of that president's poor decision-making. America must invest the resources, but also demonstrate the willingness to allow the CIA enough latitude to do its job. We must be willing to let them do in real life what we expect them to do in the movies. Sometimes that requires harsh measures. That, however, is how we move Iraq forward towards a successful conclusion and remove most of our ground forces.


********************************************************************


You will never hear about these guys on the news either, but their hard work deserves a salute.

The USNS Comfort just concluded a week long deployment in Haiti. The medical relief ship has been deployed by the Navy on a tour of the Caribbean and some Latin American nations. In Haiti the ship's staff treated over 11,000 Haitian patients in one week. Throughout the tour thus far they have seen well over 70,000. A Naval Construction Battalion Maintenance Unit went ashore to repair water facilities and work on other community projects.

Not just in Iraq and Afghanistan, but in so many places around the world our men and women in uniform work, struggle, and sometimes sacrifice to improve people's lives.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Conservatives Need to Get Out in Front on Marriage

This week an Iowa judge struck down the state's ten year ban on homosexual marriage, creating the latest in a series of signals that gay marriage bans will soon be a thing of the past. The United States Supreme Court will likely rule these bans as unconstitutional as soon as it gets the next opportunity.

Gay marriage tends to split the conservative community. Social conservatives will support bans upon it whole heartedly while economic conservatives feel less comfortable in doing so. Democrats enjoy exploiting the fact that the party that wants government off the back of the people also seems to want to keep illegal a very personal issue.

Gay couples do need some sort of legal protection. They experience many of the same problems as heterosexual couples. Those enduring abuse or theft have a more difficult time finding legal remedies for their problems. However some object to the name marriage being applied to non traditional relationships

The problem can be solved with conservative philosophy. Conservatives want the government out of our lives as much as possible. The solution is to get government out of marriage entirely. The legal contract can be a civil union done before a magistrate or some other official. It applies to either form of coupling. Marriage would be the social and cultural event. This would mean that people could call their relationships marriages and not have to worry about government interference. Gays do not want the government legally saying they are not really married, others object to the government imposing a different interpretation upon them. Getting government out of marriage makes sense. It will also get one more time consuming issue off of the plates of state legislatures and courts.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Potomac Highland Conservative Candidates at a Glance

The following Conservative Candidates have Pre-filed to run for office in 2008

  • 14th Senatorial District
  • Republican
  • Gary G. Howell
  • Hometown: Keyser, WV
  • Filed 4/26/2007
  • Home County: Mineral
  • District: Barbour, Grant (part), Mineral, Monongalia (part), Preston, Taylor, Tucker
  • 15th Senatorial District
  • Republican
  • Clark S. Barnes
  • Hometown: Elkins, WV
  • Filed 12/11/2006
  • Home County: Randolph
  • District: Berkley (part), Grant (part), Hampshire, Hardy, Morgan, Pendelton, Pocahontas, Randolph, Upshur (part)
  • 50th Delegate District
  • Republican
  • Ruth Rowan
  • Hometown: Points, WV
  • Filed 12/11/2006
  • Home County: Hampshire
  • District: Hampshire (part) and Mineral (part) Counties

  • 51st Delegate District
  • Republican
  • Daryl E. Cowles
  • Hometown: Berkeley Springs, WV
  • Filed 2/9/2007
  • Home County: Morgan
  • District: Hampshire (part) and Morgan (part) Counties.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

The Too Busy Generation

I had originally written this article specific to my fellow Gen-Xers, but an interesting thought occured to me this Sunday at church. For the first time in a long time, I turned away from the sermon, and away from my daughter to look at the other people in the congregation. Whammo! I was struck to see the same stare at the pulpit that I have seen a million times when I looked at people watching TV. I had written the article based on a generation that was too busy being distracted to be productive. Now, I am revising that to include...well...everyone. And, I pose the question, what is TV doing to our natural ability to think and reason for ourselves?

It is a common thought that ...

So, I am now calling this group of people the "Too Busy Generation". And the range of people that are affected is spreading. Actually, it is probably better labeled the Too Busy Dilemma. It is spreading to those older than Gen-X and it is probably appropriate for the younger ones as well, I just don't know them. There are so many distractions in life that we feel compelled to address this very second that we have to prioritize. A sad fact is that most people start their priority list with the activity that requires the most distraction with the least amount of personal interaction. Let's just look at a couple of activities that we do by ourselves, such As

1) TV shows- No longer is their one favorite, but there is a favorite for each night, plus re-runs of old favorites. There are favorites that can take you from the end of business day all the way to bed time. You could spend 8 hours at the office then "unwind" in front of the TV for 5-6 hours. Where does the day go?

2) Video games - I got an Xbox 360 for Christmas, I love it, but I rarely let myself turn it on. Why? Because there were several times that I played for 6-8 hours without realizing more than an hour had passed. I told some fellow gamers and they responded that they had spent 125-150 HOURS playing the same game. THAT IS A FULL MONTH OF WORK!!

3) The internet - Between email, blogging, chatting, surfing and working, it is amazing our computers have not become permanently attached to our bodies. Of course, for some, their cell phones are doubling as mini-computers so that they are always in touch with EVERYONE.

4) Music - I recently saw a fast food employee here in Keyser with headphones on. Not the ones that help him communicate with the rest of the staff, music headphones. When did our world become so full of noise? When did peace and quiet become obsolete? I guess that the prospect of being left alone with their thoughts could seem quite lonely to some.

I am going to stop listing things there. I have known all this for a while, but it has really begun wearing on me lately because I run a fairly hectic schedule, but I am not too busy to attend church, or to be a member of community groups, or to attend volunteer events, or to attend a political event. Actually, I have a lot of fun with many of these activities. But my biggest reason for championing these causes is that I want more of my fellow Americans to get involved. Liberals aren't the only ones that want to see the poor get helped, our young get educated, or our domestic lives improved. I agree 100% with many of the good intentions that liberals advocate, but I differ on one point, the government should NOT be the group in charge. Besides it's complete lack of accountability, there is no requirement for the recipient to reciprocate what they receive. That is the opposite of the economic belief system that we conservatives pro port...Capitalism. If I want a paycheck, I perform a job. If I want a loaf of bread, I pay someone who has bread. If I need my house painted, I contract someone to paint it (I am not a big fan of painting anymore).

If someone can get a government check, they don't need to find a job. Why would they. Once the checks start, they just pick them up at the post office each month. There's no boss to report to, no action necessary on their part. If the government will educate and distract their kids from 8-3 each day, why should they be bothered with teaching their kids anything or helping with homework. If the government will build parks, why would a civic group take on the challenge? If the government will pay my health bills, why wouldn't I go to the hospital every month (I know about this from growing up near a hospital, ambulances only run people to the hospital not back home. Instead of walking back, it was logical to many that the people living near the hospital should drive them home, so they knocked on our door)

Now we are entitled to have big brother take care of the trivial civic issues so that we can get to work on managing the noise in our lives.

I feel that it is an encumbrance upon myself and all conservatives to step up. We say we want smaller government, great...the poor still need support, kids still need educated, and what's the point of waking up each day if you don't do something to make your life a little better? Turn off the TV and go join a civic group, volunteer with a church, or the United Way, run for an office. And most importantly, give 110% in your volunteer work. If you believe in what you are doing, you will want to be active. If you don't believe in it, go find something you do believe in and do that. Can't find anything, start your own group. Good luck, and God Bless.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Capitalism Creating Environmental Solutions

A Toronto firm is working hard to try and make the internal combustion engine obsolete. Two years ago it purchased the rights to a new form of battery that could be plugged into an outlet for five minutes and efficiently power a car for 500 miles. EEStor of Austin, Texas previously held the rights to the promising technology.

Critics call it the modern version of alchemy, but this once again demonstrates how market needs combined with vision can lead to potential breakthroughs. People believe enough to invest time and/or effort into creations that could revolutionize the world. That is certainly noble.

However these revolutions would take place less often without the profit motive. People need to see the possibility of reward for the risks they take in money, time, and effort. Then they will invest the endless hours, sleepless nights, and life savings to make the dream real.

One can predict what will happen when the technology is finally created. Some academic will demand that rights to the invention be released and shared for the general good of the human race. It almost sounds like a joke, but you can bet it will happen. Or perhaps some environmental group will oppose it because the creating of some component threatens some obscure species,just like with the wind farms.

Regardless of these obstacles, it should be much better publicized that capitalists work the hardest to create practical solutions to environmental issues.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Want to See the Wealthiest State in the US?

Do you want to see the wealthiest state in the entire nation? All many of us have to do is to look out our front doors across the Potomac River. Yup, it's Maryland. Looking for the second poorest state will not be too hard. Just look at the ground under your feet.

Now these statistics are skewed somewhat. The $35,000 median income of West Virginia in most counties has drastically more purchasing power than in many parts of Maryland. Their median income of around $66,000 does not look nearly as good in areas where the cost of real estate is frighteningly high.

All that admitted, West Virginia should perform much better. Sure we can pat ourselves on the back for being better off than Arkansas. We can also remember when times were much worse. However these new income numbers reflect what three fourths of a century of Democratic Party leadership has done for our state. Certainly some individuals such as Senator Robert C. Byrd have worked hard and gotten some federal money sent our way. However sound conditions for economic growth would have rendered federal investment less necessary. It also would have meant West Virginia would have capitalized more on the ripple effects from the influx of public money.

The time is 2008. Vote Republican. 76 years of Democratic dominance have made 50th in too many catagories. It's time to end the slide. We would have fired a football coach for putting us consistently in last place for only a couple of years. Yet we put up with the same Ruling Party decade after decade.

Monday, September 10, 2007

The Friends of Joe Bowl

By the time this is posted, the West Virginia game with Marshall will be in the books. Likely it will be one more huge victory for the Mountaineers as they prepare for the challenging portion of their schedule beginning with Maryland.

A lot of WVU fans have formed very negative opinions of the governor as a result of this series between West Virginia University and Marshall. Basically the governor interfered in a process when he did not have to in order to score political touchdowns. What does Joe Manchin get from this game, you may ask?

Every year this game appears on television you can be sure that Joe Manchin's mug will be all over it. This year he will do almost everything except sing the national anthem, including read the starting lineups for ESPN. It's not often that a politician with national aspirations can gain free and positive national air time.

What does West Virginia University get from this game? Nothing. Absolutely nothing except a win over a rather bad college team. Due to the language of the Big East conference deal with ESPN, WVU gets no television money because it is an away game against a non-BCS school. Unlike Marshall and almost every big time college athletic program, WVU uses no money from the state or college to support its athletic program. It relies on revenues from football and men's basketball to support all of its teams, most of whom have enjoyed tremendous success over the past few years. They even pay for the athletic scholarships. You might say that WVU is one of the few capitalist college athletic programs, competing well in a world of state subsidized athletics.

Some argue that it is good for the state that the two teams play each other. They say that it keeps money in West Virginia. Certainly it does mean that money circulates from one part of the state to another. Would it not be better for the state if both teams hosted games that weekend and brought in dollars from outside the state?

As governor Joe Manchin has done some good in terms of inching the state closer towards having a better business climate. However it is stunts such as "Open for Business" and what WVU fans call "The Friends of Joe" Bowl that do tend to irritate people. Those that may be favorable to or at least neutral towards the governor have a reason to vote against him.