It's the Same Old Thing Over and Over

Yesterday I came across an old book entitled American Revisionists. When I started reading it, I came upon a tired old refrain. The president lied to get us into a war. His lies were meant to make his friends in big business richer. It was none of our business. The people we were fighting for were the real enemies and their freedom was not worth the blood of our soldiers. Our president lied to us and betrayed us to start a war that killed young men for no reason. Try and guess who they were talking about.

It could have been Lyndon B. Johnson. Vietnam was certainly an unpopular war that invigorated the anti-war movement like none we had seen since the 1860s. For that matter it could have been Abraham Lincoln who had to brave angry torrents of public opinion when he revised the meaning of the Civil War to include the freedom for slaves. Joe Kennedy, father of John, Teddy, and Robert, held those same attitudes about Franklin D. Roosevelt his entire life.

The target this time was Woodrow Wilson. He led us into World War I after an escalating series of moves by Germany to threaten the United States and cut off its trade with Europe at a pivotal point of vulnerability for the Allies. Until Germany started sinking our ships and trying to talk Mexico into a war with us, Wilson urged all Americans to keep an open mind. His goal going into the war was a breathtaking crusade to use American power to change the face of Europe and end their seemingly eternal cycle of warfare. The end of fighting saw the British and French ignore Wilson's ideals and impose upon Germany a treaty guaranteed to start another war in two decades.

Intellectuals and left wing editors slammed Wilson after research showed the Allies more guilty than originally thought and Germany to be more foolish than evil. Some of the criticism was valid, but by the 30s it reached a shrill crescendo. Some intellectuals blamed France for the war and Wilson for supporting them. France actually tried to avoid the war and was drawn in when Germany invaded it! Emotion had supplanted reason and it started affecting policy. Trouble in Europe inspired Congress to pass a series of acts to restrain Franklin Roosevelt's hand. Some even proposed that the US never enter a war without a national referendum.

Unfortunately this tied FDR's hands at the very moment that he needed freedom to act against the most deadly enemy we had ever faced. Years in which US action might have cowed Adolf Hitler were spent by FDR patiently undoing the damage caused by hysterical intellectuals and their effect upon the public. The lesson we learned between 1941-45 was that the world is smaller and potentially more dangerous. Our president needs to act to forestall aggression, not wait until it hits our shores.

The legacy of the Bush presidency is still playing out. Certainly he headed off a potentially disastrous problem that Saddam Hussein's psychopathic sons would have presented. At the same time he demonstrated the American will to act that enhanced our credibility among those that hate us. History should reflect that as a positive step in our history.

Supporting Local Businesses

I went back "home" for Easter to the town where I grew up, Portsmouth, OH. It seems much more vibrant, new restaurants are coming in, a movie theater was built, stores are expanding, and, my favorite store, Steve and Barry's added a location in the Portsmouth area. The population of Portsmouth has not grown in any significant way. The town has little industry to speak of, having once been a large railroad hub and steel center on the Ohio River. So what is propelling the changes in the area? Small business people. The same guys/gals that owned small stores and "mom and pop" restaurants while I lived there are now able to re-invest in the community. One group of brothers have continued to expand their small restaurant business to include franchises with Wendy's, BW-3s, and others. Together with other investors a once vacant area near a railroad track now features several restaurants, a business center and a movie theater. Other small business owners purchased property vacated by a Wal-Mart relocation and recruited new stores to fill the space (like Steve and Barry's). When I was growing up, we always traveled to do school shopping. With the addition of several clothing stores, locals are now able to shop locally, saving their gas money and time.

Keep this in mind the next time that you are shopping at Wal-Mart or heading to Hagerstown. Have you looked at the local small business stores for what you need? In Keyser, it is probably not possible to find everything that you need in local stores, but you can certainly buy some of the items that you need from local small business people. You may pay a little more, but small, local business owners take their profits and re-invest in offering more items and better locations. Just like you and me, they want to provide their children and grand-children with more opportunities and a better life than they had. That will lead, as it has in Portsmouth, to more variety more jobs and even more investment in the community.

US Falls to 22nd Most Stable Country

The US fell to 22nd in Jane's Country Risk Assessment which ranks the 235 countries and independent territories in the world on risk and prosperity. The top ten were the Vatican, Sweden, Luxembourg, Monaco, Gibraltar, San Marino, the United Kingdom, Liechtenstein, the Netherlands and the Irish Republic. The bottom ten included the West Bank and Gaza, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, the Ivory Coast, Haiti, Zimbabwe, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Central African Republic.

The top 30 countries in the world are considered stable. The US scored 93 out of a possible 100. Christian Le Mière, managing editor of Jane's Country Risk Assessment stated the reason for the drop to 22nd was "partly because of the proliferation of small arms owned by Americans and the threat to the population posed by the flow of drugs from across the Mexican border."

While I agree with the study that says our border security increases the risk to Americans. It is not just from drugs as it allows for the possibility for terrorist entering the county. I strongly disagree that gun owning American's increase the risk. The facts are that those citizens exercising their 2nd Amendments add to the security of America.

This study is flawed. Most of the top 10 are the worlds smallest nations. They are not exactly secure. Consider that when Germany invaded Western Europe in 1940, Luxembourg was nothing more than a speed bump in the Blitzkrieg race to the Channel. With the exception of the United Kingdom the rest of the counties in the top ten primarily rely on the goodwill of one country to maintain their freedom. That country would be the United States.

The study does not take into effect the stabilizing effect the United States has on the world. The study is flawed in that respect.

Greear says legislative effort to slow Attorney General did not go far enough

For Immediate Release
March 25, 2008

Contact:
Greear for AG Committee
Suzette Raines, 304-437-1306

Huntington, WV – Charleston attorney and former member of the House of Delegates, Dan Greear, spoke to the Cabell County Republican Women's Club today as he campaigns for the office of Attorney General. The meeting will take place at noon at the Pullman Plaza Hotel in Huntington.

Greear discussed the constant struggle the West Virginia Legislature has encountered with Attorney General Darrell McGraw. McGraw has dispersed settlement money at his own discretion rather than allowing the Legislature to appropriate the money as is their constitutional duty.

In response to the conflict with the Attorney General, H.B. 104 was passed during a recent Special Session and requires McGraw to inform the Legislature of potential monetary settlements.

Greear stated it will not prevent McGraw from employing his normal practice of distributing settlement money, but will only require him to disclose that information to the Legislature. Greear praised the Governor and Legislature for taking the first step, but said HB 104 did not go nearly far enough.

"The Attorney General should be solving legal problems, not creating them," said Greear. "Once again, McGraw is forcing the Legislature to pass legislation to try to curb his abuses. Considering all the problems our state faces, the Legislature should not be forced to fix the messes of a constitutional officer," said Greear.

"This bill was supported by Democrats and Republicans alike. I believe the bi-partisan support says a great deal about the dissatisfaction with McGraw, but much more must be done to reign in his abuses," added Greear.

Greear is a lifelong resident of Kanawha County, graduating from South Charleston High School in 1986 as a National Merit Scholar. He graduated from the WVU School of Law in the spring of 1992 where he also served as associate manuscript editor for the West Virginia Law Review. He served in the West Virginia House of Delegates representing Kanawha County’s 30th District in 1995 and 1996. Dan currently resides in South Charleston with his wife Amy, a social worker for Kanawha Hospice Care, and their two children, Joshua, 8 and Ben, 6.

Why Obama's Pastor Matters

I believe that I belong to a generation of Americans ("Generation X") who have moved beyond the race issue that has consumed this nation from its inception to the present. I, and those I associate with, embrace and live the ideals of racial equality; indeed, I personally have never known any other way. I grew up in a mixed-race neighborhood in New Jersey before moving to West Virginia 15 years ago.

The embrace of the Obama campaign by a large and deep cross-section of Americans indicates that there are many, especially among the young, who feel--as I do--that race is a non-issue in the selection of a President.

That is why Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama's spiritual mentor and adviser, matters.

Wright, to get to the point, is a racist. For kickers, he's also a loon, believing as he does that the U.S. government invented the AIDS virus. And as West Virginia Democrats and independents consider their primary election options, consider whether you would vote for someone who joined, as an adult, Fred Phelps' "World Church of the Creator", and made annual contributions that exceed West Virginia's average annual income. Phelps' great contributions to society include protesting Iraq war funerals, in addition to his protest at the Sago Mine memorial a couple of years ago, as a messenger of "God's wrath" against the decadence of America.

And that's the problem with Obama and Wright. Obama put his money where Wright's mouth was. And, in the great scheme of things, Wright is no different that Phelps. Would you vote for a member of Phelps' church for President? Or would you consider it a sufficient lapse in judgment as to lose your vote? To ask the question is to answer it.

Gas Price Protesting

I got an e mail from a family member yesterday. It was a forward that was trying to organize a gas price protest. I usually get these about once a month. They are usually pretty similar in that they target oil companies as the culprit if pricing and seek to diminish their profits by boycotting gas for a day. This one was different in that it targeted corporations instead of the whole industry.

Either way, the resentment is misplaced. Any action ought to be directed at incumbents and candidates for Congress. I sent a response to the e mail that read:

The problem is not the oil companies. The reason they jack prices up is because of supply constraints. They do profit a lot off of it, but the high prices keep demand low enough to prevent a shortage. Only one problem would be worse than high prices and that is complete supply cut off. The oil companies set prices as a response to the very complex situation that the US legal system has created. There are four things that Congress can do to get gas prices down.

First, drill in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge and reduce our dependence on foreign supplies. Jimmy Carter shut that down because they thought a few oil wells would endanger reindeer and bear populations. Coal mining has not done that here and oil wells are less intrusive.

Second, cut the red tape necessary to refine oil. We have not built a new refinery since the 1970s in the US and we have lost a few. Much of our oil is now refined in Venezuela, a country led by an anti-American madman.

Also we have a bewildering set of laws that vary from state to state on the cleanliness of gasoline. Refineries have to create a wide variety of blends to match state and local laws. They have to determine the supply and demand necessities for all those localities and that is impossible to do. Why not take the best environmental standard and make that the national standard?

Last, phase out oil fired power plants. We have resources at home that can run our power plants; we certainly do not need to keep importing oil for that purpose. West Virginia itself, between coal, natural gas, and wind, can produce a lot more power than it can possibly consume. All we have to do is construct the plants. If we are smart, we will allow them to be built here in West Virginia near the sources and export the power out.

The first two points came directly from John Raese's campaign for US Senate and they make sense both in terms of our economy and security. Combatting high gas prices while maintaining a strong economy means looking at the complex relationships between supply and demand as well as the obstacles placed in the way of oil companies who desire to meet that demand.

ROUTE 50 IN FREDERICK COUNTY, VA WILL HAVE MAJOR CLOSURES

ROUTE 50 IN FREDERICK COUNTY

Closures will be March 28-31 and April 18-21

STAUNTON – Motorists traveling on Route 50 near the Virginia border with West Virginia should be alert for two upcoming temporary but major traffic pattern changes.

The first closure will take place beginning at 4 p.m. on March 28 and lasting until 5 a.m. on March 31. Both eastbound lanes of Route 50 (Northwestern Pike) in the Gore area of Frederick County will be closed. This location is approximately .1 mile west of Route 752 (Knob Road) and is near the Virginia and West Virginia state line.

The closure is due to railroad work being performed by the Winchester and Western Railroad in the Gore area. All work is weather permitting.

The detour for the Route 50 eastbound closure from March 28 to 31 is as follows:

Traffic traveling east on Route 50 from any point west of the Gore area, including West Virginia, should head west on Route 50 into West Virginia and turn right onto Route 29 north to Route 127 east and continue to Route 522 south. Motorists should stay on Route 522 south until they reach Route 37. To get back on to Route 50 travelers should head south on Route 37 to the next interchange, which is Route 50.

Passenger vehicles can use an alternate shorter route at Route 703 (Whitacre Road) located west of Gore. This alternate route uses several secondary roads which are not suitable for tractor trailer traffic.

The second closure will be from April 18 to 21 at the same location. Both westbound Route 50 lanes will be closed beginning at 7 p.m. on April 18 and lasting until 5 a.m. on April 21. VDOT will send out detour information at the beginning of April.

Traffic alerts and traveler information can be obtained by dialing 511. In areas where 511 is unavailable, dial 1-800-578-4111. (TTY/TDD users, call 711). Traffic alerts and traveler information also are available at 511Virginia.org.

Highway safety is everyone’s responsibility. Virginia’s highway safety partnership — the Virginia Department of Transportation, Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles and Virginia State Police — challenges you to help prevent highway fatalities. Buckle up. Avoid distractions. Share the road. Drive drug- and alcohol-free. Obey speed limits. For more information on the Highway Safety Challenge and things you can do to avoid becoming Virginia’s next traffic fatality, visit www.safeVAhighways.org.

The Energy Answer is Under Our Feet

Of all the states, West Virginia’s economy ranks at the bottom while we sit on mountains filled with energy in the middle of an energy crunch. Our economy should be booming, yet it is not. One reason is that we have a tendency to look to government for solutions and not to ourselves. Ronald Reagan once said, “Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.” His words hold true today. Everyday as we fuel up our vehicles paying close to $4 or more per gallon we are reminded government has not solved the problem, nor will it.

Government officials hold meetings and conferences, form committees and coalitions, but then all that happens is they talk about the problem and get their pictures in the media. One conference referred to the “New Technology of Coal Liquefaction.” For the record Friedrich Bergius developed one of the first processes for turning coal into gasoline almost 100 years ago.

Government doesn’t even know how old the processes are; are we sure we want it in charge?
One of the ideas being floated is a Private-Public Partnership, where government becomes a partner in the construction and operation of a coal liquefaction plant. The problem is government becomes the dominating partner in these ventures; the project becomes bloated, inefficient, and politically influenced to the detriment of the private business partner, the taxpayer and the consumer. History also reveals that the term “corporatism” was coined by Benito Mussolini to describe Private-Public Partnerships, which were used as a way to maintain government control. This is not a road we want to go down.

So what should be government’s role? Government’s first and most important goal should be to make as level and competitive playing field as possible. We must give West Virginia’s businesses a competitive advantage through business friendly tax and legal reforms. Half measures like eliminating the franchise tax by 2015 is not going to give us a competitive advantage anytime soon. It is like getting in a swimming pool one toe at a time instead of jumping in all at one time, getting wet and starting to swim. We must enact the needed tax and legal reforms wholly and fully now — get the initial shock out of the way and then begin to swim in increased jobs and tax revenue as our economy expands because West Virginia will be economically competitive.

So if government’s job should be to provide a level playing field for the competitors, then how do we move forward? The free market will always seek the lowest price and if fuel made from coal is cheaper, then the market will purchase fuel made from coal instead of oil. While we know we can currently make fuel cheaper from coal than oil, the problem is in regard to the cost and time of building the coal liquefaction plant. That cost is estimated at around $2 billion with about 2 years of construction. Some company has to be willing to risk the investment in the plant and take the chance that oil prices will remain high long enough for the plant to pay them back with interest.

Sometimes the only nudge the free market needs is the spark of an idea. Consider that CSX Corporation in 2006 purchased $1.2 billion dollars worth of fuel and you know from your own visits to the pump its 2008 numbers are substantially higher. What if the West Virginia coal Industry sits down with CSX Corp and says, since CSX already services 130 active coal mines and purchases billions of dollars worth of fuel, together we can build a profitable coal liquefaction plant. The plant could provide CSX with lower cost fuel, provide West Virginia coal producers with a new market outlet, provide high paying jobs across the board, give the state increased tax revenues and pump billions of dollars into the West Virginia economy.

As a state loaded with natural resources we have an opportunity, but only if we are willing to make the necessary political changes to make it happen. If we are not held back by Charleston’s bad economic policies, then West Virginia has an answer to the nation’s energy challenges. That answer is under our feet.

Teachers

I have held this post for a while, but recently read an article about how Preston County teachers are concerned about low wages compared to their counterparts in neighboring states. The solution from the Education department is always pay more, spend more, vote for our $15 million levy. Unfortunately we are a low income state that needs a better solution. Our teachers are not underpaid because they are undervalued, they work in a low income, low cost of living state. If your customers can't afford to pay for your product, it's time to adjust the product. When you lack the money you think you need, it is time to adjust your strategy. Is more money the solution to this problem? I would be tempted to entertain that notion if someone could tell me a) how much is being spent on education today and b) how much more to achieve the goals set forth.

The National Education Association reports that WV teachers have an average salary of $40,531 which is $10,000 less than the national average. What does the statistic leave off? A little math. This isn't meant to be a criticism of what teachers get paid or the status of our schools, just to ask the question, how much more is needed? After all, levies are constantly being proposed and denied, surely there is a solution out there.

The average WV primary earner brings in around $36,000 per year. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/medincearnersandstate.html I like this listing by number of earners in the family because it better reflects what the average family is living with. I have heard numbers as low as $20K for the average WV income. As you become a two and three earner family the statistics get a little skewed by part time workers, kids living at home and working, etc.

Most people are more familiar with what they are paid per hour. I ran these numbers past a friend who teaches and they already knew this to be true. The school year runs 180 days, most people with 2 weeks of vacation work 250 days. The school day runs about 8-3, with a lunch and at least one planning period, let's call that 6 hours per day. That comes to 180days x 6 hours = 1080 hours per year. To be overly fair, let's add in some bonus hours for in service and general planning, what the heck, lets add 120 hours of "extra" work time. That gives a work year of 1200 hours. Now, $40, 531/1200 = $33.63 per hour. That's 7x the current minimum wage. This doesn't include benefits and pension, and assumes no sick days or snow days that don't get made up for. The national average is over $50,000 per year which means the national hourly rate for teachers is $41.66 per hour. Compared to a non-teacher counterpart in 52 week per year work force with the same annual salary we see that they work 9-5 or 7 hours per day, 50 weeks per year (allowing 2 weeks for vacation) and thus make $40.531/1750 hours = $23.16/ hour. The average WV earner making $36K brings in about $20.51 per hour of work. Roughly $13 per hour less than our teachers.

Think a little about these numbers the next time you see a pending strike from teachers or hear complaints about how underpaid our teachers are. Then try to put this math to the salaries of college professors...just for fun. You might discover the major reason that the cost of higher education is skyrocketing.

Compared to the nation our teachers are underpaid. But isn't that true of everyone in WV? Compared to their fellow WVs they are some of the highest earners in the state. Most of us make less than our counterparts in the rest of the country.

Today the US Supreme Court Heard a 2nd Amendment Case

While we will not know the outcome from some time, the fundamental question is whether or not the right to bear arms is a collective right or an individual right.

The 2nd Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." To any student of history it is clear that the 2nd Amendment is an individual right, but some believe it is not.

Over 200 years ago the people of the American Colonies petitioned the Crown and their calls fell on deaf ears. In the Declaration of Independence it states, "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States." Our forefathers understood what Tyranny was, they lived under it, most of us have not.

When they wrote the Bill of Rights, these men understood what was necessary to preserve freedom. First they understood that a free people needed the ability to speak openly about government and more importantly the ability to disagree with government. That is why the first amendment is the Guarantee of Freedom of Speech.

These men had also knew what happened Freedom of Speech is taken away and they got it back my force of arms. Without the Right to Bear Arms, there would be no United States. My ancestor John Moore was one of those men that took up arms against the crown and helped form this nation. These men that formed our nation understood the true cost of freedom.

Many of us understand that the 2nd Amendment is to protect both the 1st Amendment and to allow individuals to protect themselves when government can't. Should government try to take away freedom of speech from the people, the people have the ability to keep it as long as the right to bare arms is not infringed. A free people should never fear its government, government should aways fear its people.

Those that wish to give up the Right to Bear Arms will ultimately give up the right to free speech. The 2nd Amendment is an individual right.

WV GOP out of debt

State Party Chairman Doug McKinney proudly announced that the WV GOP is out of debt, at the Winter meeting held in South Charleston Saturday.

Many in the state party worked hard to pay of the debt lead by Larry Pack and Jim Reed. Bob Fish and the crew of the state Presidential Convention also deserve credit from bringing positive cash flow.

Many candidates were on hand for the event including US Senate Candidate Jay Wolfe, Gubernatorial Candidate Russ Weeks, Attorney General candidate Dan Greear, Secretary of State candidate Charles Minimah, and Agriculture Commissioner candidates Lawrence Beckerle and Michael Teets. The party is upbeat and ready to take on the Democrats in November.

The PHC Celerbrates its first birthday

One year ago today a group of us decided that a voice was needed to get out the correct information that often goes unreported in the Potomac Highlands, and sometime around the state. With a year under our belt and over 10 contributors providing content we have successfully gotten much needed and accurate information out the people of the state.

One of the success stories was the exposing of the myth that Mineral County is low on water resources in the article "Scare Tactics Used Against Mineral County Residents."

Another was Christy Barnett's story "Does Mineral County Want Economic Development?"

I would like to take this time to thank all those who have contributed to the blog and to our loyal readers that stretch from the Potomac Highlands to Charleston to Washington. Without your support we could not have been the success that we have become.

Another Issue That West Virginia Democrats Do Not Understand: Two Year Colleges

If it ain't broke don't fix it. That is the tried and true engineer maxim. One of the few things in West Virginia that ain't broke is the college and university system. However, Senate Education Chairman Bob Plymale seems determined to fix it.

His target is West Virginia University at Parkersburg. Somewhat like Potomac State College, WVU-P is a branch campus of West Virginia University. It serves students in Wood and at its own branch in Ripley. Like Potomac State students, many in the mid Ohio Valley want to get a degree from West Virginia University eventually, but do not want to make the complete leap from high school to mega campus. Campuses such as WVU-P and Potomac State give state students more options. A student can earn a two year terminal degree or go on to WVU. In the smaller campus they have a wide range of majors to pursue. The trend recently has seen WVU's two year schools expand their offerings in both two and four year programs.

This not only allows for more choices, if allowed to continue it ensures continued economic development in these communities at less cost to the state over time. As the cost of tuition in the Northeast rockets to amazing heights, these small colleges increasingly serve out of state students and earn their mother institutions more money. Imagine the benefit to Keyser and Mineral County as a whole if Potomac State becomes a four year school? Parkersburg is another former industrial city that could use such a shot in the arm.

Plymale has his own very limited vision for state two year schools. He sees them as useful for workforce development alone and wants to slice away WVU-P from its mother campus. Sorry all you history, literature, and political science majors who are not quite ready for a 30,000 student campus. Senator Plymale says small colleges are for workforce development only. Potomac State's relationship with WVU is much tighter and is likely going to remain unaffected, at least for now. Who knows what plans Plymale has for the future?

Basically Plymale seeks to limit the options available to state students because he thinks he has a better idea. Liberals often do prefer to think for others since the common people surely cannot decide such important issues on their own. Fortunately WVU-P has Republican allies in the Legislature such as Frank Deem and Donna Boley. Boley accuses Plymale and others of "back room" dealing.

Deem and Boley need help if they are to save WVU-P from having to break from WVU. Marshall University also has a major branch campus in Point Pleasant and they need to watch these developments closely. WVU president Mike Garrison needs support from his peers as well as Governor Manchin to ensure that the Legislature keeps its hands off institutions such as WVU-P.

Senator Clark Barnes and the Law of Unintended Consequences

The law of unintended consequences is a fact of life in West Virginia. Our Democratic leadership has unleashed this draconian condition time and time again because they rarely think through the effects of the laws that they create. Here is one example from several years ago. Sweeping anti-drug laws remove the prerogatives of school principals to deal with their own students, resulting in children expelled from school for illegally passing a Halls cough drop.

This is how it all starts. The people come to their legislators with a problem, such as poor attendance and dropout rates in West Virginia schools. Now everyone wants to increase school attendance and keep kids in school until they graduate. That point is hard to dispute. The law says that kids can opt out of school after age sixteen, so what leverage do we have to keep these kids on track to graduation? The answer is a state driver's license. Licenses are privileges, not natural, or constitutional rights (although most liberals rate it above the right to use a gun to protect your family.) The state Legislature wants the dropout rate to improve so driver's licenses are revoked on minors that are not attending school.

Terrific! Watch the school attendance rate rise and we feel much better about ourselves. We used the power of government to create positive social change.

But we forgot something. We forgot to think it through. We forgot about the exceptions to our scenario of lazy kids just ducking school to play video games. Some sixteen and seventeen year olds are not in school for a good reason. They have to work to help put food on the table. Some have children of their own. In Clark Barnes' district one minor mother has a child with a severe birth defect. The defect is so severe it requires constant monitoring. The mother made the right decision and put her child first. The law said that she could not have a driver's license, but she sometimes has to rush her child to the hospital from her rural home.

When a concerned citizen brought this to Senator Barnes' attention, he immediately went to work and got the Senate to amend the law. Luckily he acted in time. However what if the child had a severe problem before he acted?

We should all thank the humanitarianism of Senator Barnes because he did work to change a fairly popular law. However the lesson here is that we need to think very carefully before using the power of government to adjust the non criminal behavior of individuals. This usually does too much damage to warrant the assumed good.

Secret Denunciations Soon to be Legal in Mineral County

When the Mineral County Clean Up Committee finalized its discussions on the proposed clean up ordinance last fall, one thing was made clear. Those who file complaints would have their names included on the complaint. Our legal system recognizes that those facing accusations must know the name of those making the complaint. It is only fair to the accused.

The Mineral County Commission just altered the proposed ordinance so that unidentified complainants can get the enforcement official to file the complaints on their behalf. This performs an end run around the spirit of the ordinance and of our legal system itself by encouraging secret denunciations. Those who support this measure would claim that having the enforcement official file the complaints on behalf of those who would remain anonymous serves as a sort of vetting process. A reasonable official, they would state, would eliminate unreasonable complaints. However what if the enforcement official is unreasonable, incompetent, or corrupt? Such scenarios have happened in the history of this state.

What is particularly galling is that this was passed to protect complainants who would hesitate to step forward because they were elderly, handicapped, ill, or feared reprisal. When measures were proposed that would protect property owners who were poor, ill, or otherwise vulnerable, these were rejected as "reverse discrimination" against the rich. Now the county commission is proposing that the ill, handicapped, elderly, etc. need extra protection so long as they are not the target of the complaint!

If we are going to have a law err on the side of protecting anyone's rights, it ought to be the property owner. Indigent, ill, disabled, or other property owners have no protection whatsoever. Supposedly vulnerable accusers, however, are accorded protective status over and above that of even victims of criminal acts. The latitude of free speech rights is rightfully extensive. assumed to cover almost any form of pornography or dissent. Other natural rights such as those regarding gun ownership and property are not taken nearly as seriously. This is the case because these rights limit the power that government has over the people.

Sometimes issues of security do need protection for those making official reports. If suspicious people are seen boarding a plane, it is important to get the information quickly so authorities can determine the validity of the threat. Since unused barns are less likely to escape the property line to wreck havoc and terror in various parts of the nation, this is a case where government power needs to be restrained.

We've Been Here Before . . .

A presidential race should be about a lot of things. It should reflect an intelligent discussion of the issues between experienced candidates. The people should take in reasonable arguments from both sides and make an informed choice. Presidential elections ought not be a beauty contest where feel good rhetoric overwhelms sensible discussion.

The Democratic contest right now reflects a struggle between those who support a candidate who has positions on real issues versus a guy campaigning on good looks and a fairly vague message of hope. Conservatives (Karl Rove included) seem to gravitate towards their old enemy Hillary Clinton and increasingly see Barrack Obama as a nightmare scenario. Republicans have actually switched parties to help Clinton win primaries.

The media says this happens because Republicans see Clinton as more vulnerable. Actually Clinton is the tougher candidate for McCain to beat because they appeal to the same moderate swing voters who likely would not go to Obama. Many Clintoncrats would tend to vote for McCain if their candidate lost. Many Republicans want Clinton to obtain the nomination because if worse comes to worst, many would rather see another President Clinton than a President Obama.

America has been here before. In 1920 the Republican Party ran Senator Warren G. Harding. His main characteristics were a congenial nature, good looks, and the vague idea that America needed to "return to normalcy." Harding had almost no real experience. Party officials supported him because they figured women would turn out in droves to support an attractive male (some did more than just vote for him.) Harding asked America to turn tail and run from the mess in Europe and disengage from the problems emerging there. We voted for the good looking guy who appealed to our emotions rather than our heads.

Harding was in over his head. He failed to prevent the Battle of Blair Mountain in which thousands of Americans fought each other on a thirty mile front over labor issues. Harding failed to even address the issues. Unlike the staunchly Republican President Grant two generations before, Harding failed to tackle the reformation of the Ku Klux Klan than terrorized blacks, Jews, and Catholics. He could not even manage his own friends as they used their position to enrich themselves at the expense of the public. Worst of all, America's disengagement from Europe set the stage for it to descend into the hell of World War II.

Obama wants to be president very badly (at least Harding had some misgivings about his lack of experience and knowledge.) This is not the right time in history for someone like this to end up in the White House. The United States faces challenges from terror groups as well as established powers such as Russia. We need to hammer out an energy policy to secure our nation and its economy. Poor decisions by large numbers of individuals have destabilized the economy. Obama wants to raise taxes considerably while pulling the US out of the Middle East so that the evil forces therein have free reign. Under such plans our economy and security suffer tremendously.

It's not time for a neophyte. It's not even time for a Clinton. It's time for McCain. Only a Republican has the principles proven over time to set it right.

******************************************************************

Prayers should go out to Senator Robert C. Byrd. We all hope that he makes a speedy recovery and returns to his post soon.

Financially Illiterate

Auto loaning just reached a new milestone recently. Some credit outfits now offer nine year loans to purchase new automobiles. While this helps consumers to negotiate much lower payments, it also benefits the credit firms who will bring in much more on interest. Unfortunately the value in a car at a certain point declines so quickly that many will find themselves owing more than the car is worth or paying on a car that died. This comes from a credit industry currently reeling because they greedily encouraged marginal buyers to make poor decisions on home loans.

The answer does not lie in more regulation. People got what they paid for and reaped the rewards of their judgment. To help consumers make good decisions, education is needed.

West Virginia currently requires four years of math to obtain a high school diploma. This contains an element of absurdity currently because most students never need higher math, not to mention the fact that advanced math subjects must have lower standards to ensure a decent rate of passage. What West Virginia and every state needs to do is to offer an alternative real life mathematics course for seniors. Few students ever need trigonometry or calculus in their chosen fields (although you should never stop offering these subjects.) Every student needs to know how to balance a checkbook, create a household budget, figure up a tip, do their income taxes, negotiate loans on a limited budget, and other real world skills.

Is it not amazing that schools have thoroughly embraced the idea that fifth graders need to know every last detail about sex, but they have not given the same attention to finances? Poor decisions about sex can ruin a life, so can uninformed financial decisions. Our economy is experiencing problems because entire generations have gone uninformed about how serious credit decisions can affect their lives. It is time that every high school in our state offer a math course on how to deal with the real world.

Vice Presidential Nominees?

John McCain's first question as nominee is the most difficult. Who will share the ticket?

Geographical logic points to the South to balance McCain's western origins. He needs to shore up a very questioning southern base, especially if Clinton rebounds and gains the Democratic nomination. A southern conservative would be extremely helpful.

Mike Huckabee looks like a good choice on the surface. He campaigns well in the South due to his impoverished childhood and religious beliefs. Huckabee brings to the table a man experienced in domestic issues. However in this race the GOP should shy away from a "two white guy" ticket. George W. Bush produced the most diverse administration in the history of the country. The Republican Party has done a great job in the past ten years developing female and minority leaders. Who could fit the bill?

Elizabeth Dole currently serves as the US Senator from North Carolina. She formerly ran the Red Cross and ran for president in 2000. She brings assets to the table, such as her congenial husband Robert who ran for president in 1996. Robert Dole also suffered serious wounds in combat and was a leader in the Senate for many years. Dole has avoided the limelight for the past eight years. This could help or hurt.

Senator Mel Martinez from Florida has great influence in that state's powerful Cuban community and could help sway moderate and Hispanic voters elsewhere. California could come into play for the GOP in 2008 and Martinez would only help. Martinez has the confidence of the RNC and has worked very hard to help the national party leadership.

Michael Steele from Maryland has electrifying charisma and energy. When he ran in the last election, civil rights groups in his state showed their hypocrisy by pelting him with Oreo cookies. He also showed an ability to connect with conservative Western Marylanders. I remember in 2006 speaking with some rather confused older voters in West Virginia who expressed the hope that "you help Steele beat Byrd." Steele also holds strong conservative credentials. His ability to make such a strong impression on Western Maryland and Eastern West Virginia means that Steele could find receptive audiences elsewher ein the South. However his national exposure has been limited.

McCain also has an asset in Rudolph Giuliani who has his own backing. For many reasons, he would make an unsuitable vice presidential nominee, but might help the ticket as a proposed Secretary of State or Attorney General. George W. Bush benefited from early speculation that the respected Colin Powell would be his chief diplomat.

The vice presidential nomination is one of McCain's most important choices and will go a long way towards determining whether or not he wins come November.

McCain Wins Nomination

As of Super Tuesday, the Republican Party received the news it had expected for some time. John McCain is the party's nominee for president.

A couple of months ago, this prospect unnerved many conservative Republicans. McCain does differ in opinion from conservatives on some issues. He, along with other Republicans in border regions, has a different idea about immigration than most. McCain's joke about being a "conservative liberal" probably did not help.

That being said, Republicans have not won elections by selecting doctrinaire nominees. Dwight D. Eisenhower campaigned on "compassionate conservatism" that sought to soften the edges of free market economics. Richard Nixon engaged in heavy handed economic controls to try and right the ship after the disastrous Johnson presidency. Neither George Bush could be called right wingers when one examines their policies. Ronald Reagan even evoked savage conservative criticism when he embarked on a peace path towards Mikhail Gorbachev's Soviet Union.

We are conservatives, but we also reason and speak freely. This is why the media loves to pick on conservatism, because we are never unified and our debates usually happen in public. Liberals have ousted their own free thinkers, such as Joe Lieberman (you could call him the Democratic version of John McCain.) Liberals started tearing away at Angelina Jolie's statement that US troops are needed in Iraq to prevent humanitarian disasters. They cannot tolerate deviations from their increasingly left wing agenda.

John McCain is not a 100% right wing conservative, this is true. Neither was any other GOP president. We win elections because we choose and support moderate candidates who think and act on their principles instead of the party line. McCain has sacrificed a great deal for his country and he is the only candidate left that America can trust in a crisis.

****************************************************************

Has Mineral County run out of water yet? Just checking. It would be best to keep any other businesses from coming in just in case.

It's not brain surgery...or wait...yeah it is

http://www.freemarketcure.com/brainsurgery.php

This is a short film about the resulting "efficiency" of government, single payor health plans. Health insurance for all sounds great. Who wouldn't love to help provide everyone with health care? It is heart breaking to see a person with cancer or other terminal illness as their health degrades. It is further frustrating to see the family struggle financially, emotionally, and spiritually. Those who oppose universal health care do not oppose it because we don't want to see people get treated, we oppose it because universal health care doesn't mean that we all get universally great health care, it likely means that we all get universally poor health care as highlighted in this video clip.

At the end the health broker asks where his clients will go for surgery if this plan comes to the U.S. Get ready to pack your bags for India.

As Gary Howell says " With government health care you get all of the caring of the IRS combined with the efficiency of the Post Office".

Republican group decries legislator pay increase

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Lisa Peana

March 3, 2008 304-730-4599

Republican group decries legislator pay increase

Leader calls raise ‘an arrogant slap in the face to our working families’

Charleston, WV – Last week, the West Virginia Legislature passed House Bill 4076 which granted its members a five-thousand dollar increase in base pay. “In the biggest display of arrogance and disregard for fiscal responsibility, Democrats in the House and Senate putting their own interests ahead of many more important priorities they should be addressing,” said Lisa Peana, President of the West Virginia Republican Club.

“This bill not only increases the cost of Government to our taxpayers in West Virginia, it also allows for more citizens to become career politicians.”

Awaiting signature by Governor Joe Manchin, the base pay for legislators in both chambers will increase from $15,000 per year to $20,000 per year. The bill also increases per diem pay for legislators staying in Charleston from out of town from $115.00 per day to $130.00.

“According to the Federal Bureau for Economic Analysis , the average West Virginian earns $27,897 per year. A typical West Virginian will have to work 261 days to earn what a Legislator is paid in 60 days in base pay alone.

“It is an arrogant slap in the face to our working families that legislators feel that granting themselves a pay increase is more important that finding ways to cut taxes and bring jobs to our communities.”

House Bill 4076 passed the House of Delegates on Tuesday with 62 yeas, 36 nays, and 2 not voting. The bill was approved by the State Senate on Friday, with 20 yeas, 13 nays, and 1 not present. Governor Joe Manchin has recently indicated that he supports the pay raise and will likely sign it into law, which would grant the legislators their pay increase in 2009.

Related Links:

HB4076 Bill Text

http://www.legis.state.wv.us/Bill_Text_HTML/2008_SESSIONS/RS/BILLS/HB4076%20ENG%20SUB.htm

House Roll Call

http://www.legis.state.wv.us/Bulletin_Board/2008/RS/House/Votes/00210.pdf

Senate Journal

http://www.legis.state.wv.us/Bulletin_Board/2008/rs/Senate/S_DAILY_JOURNAL/sdj-52nd%20day.htm#HDO

Per Capita Income by State (2006 estimates, 2005 actual)

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/spi/2007/xls/spi0307.xls

McCain won't raise taxes?

McCain told ABC's "This Week" that under no circumstances would he increase taxes, and added that he could "see an argument, if our economy continues to deteriorate, for lower interest rates, lower tax rates, and certainly decreasing corporate tax rates," as well as giving people the ability to write off depreciation and eliminating the alternative minimum tax.---http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/mccain_taxes/2008/02/17/73372.html?s=al&promo_code=4568-1

This seems a little odd since he voted against the Bush tax cuts, but I am encouraged to hear that he can at least occassionally sound conservative. Thus far my understanding is that in November we will be choosing between a liberal Republican or a Socialist. Even though I don't share the "suicide voter" mentality as illustrated by Gary Howell in a prior entry, I do share Rush Limbaugh's point that McCain should not try to appease Conservatives by pretending to be Conservative on several key issues. Most Republicans are going to vote for McCain and, hopefully, the idea of Obama or Hillary (note:Hillary used to come first when referring to the duo) in the White House is enough to scare moderates to vote for McCain.

I can't help but to feel that many Republicans are voting with an apologetic mentality. There seems to be a need to make a peace offering with the left by offering a candidate that many on the left can approve of in order to "make-up" for the Bush years. If this is to be the case, McCain may be a good choice for an apology candidate. Afterall, offering a candidate that both sides can live with is certainly better than handing the Democrats the White House by offering a sacrificial, weak candidate.

Keeping it Real

"I don't believe Bible-believing Christians should participate in the mainstreaming of Mormonism." -- Brian Bigelow, Fayette County Delegate (and Huckabee voter) to the West Virginia GOP Convention on February 5, 2008, as quoted in USA Today.

Is this what our party stands for? Mindless sectarian fear of another faith as a basis for electing (or not electing, in this case) the President of the United States?

I don't know who Brian Bigelow is, except that he originally supported Rudy Giuliani. So, for Mr. Bigelow it's more important to defeat--gasp!--a Mormon than to defeat someone who supports abortion rights and the gay agenda? Is that what "Bible-believing Christians" stand for?

I more than realize that the issue is more or less moot with the exit of Governor Romney from the presidential race, but this is something that we--as a party, as a conservative movement--must confront and defeat. Someday there will be another Mormon running for president. Someday, a Mormon will run for your county commission, or for the legislature, or for a statewide office. Are we going to allow this same hate to torpedo those future candidacies as well?

Will evangelicals of Mr. Bigelow's ilk require future candidates to sign off on a particular creed or statement of religious beliefs? Does a candidate have to be a young-earth creationist to get his OK? What about a rejection of UPC bar codes? Mark of the beast, you know.

Maryland, what a neighbor

I have had a couple of run-ins with the state of Maryland and I am growing more and more irritated with MD's state government.

The first happened shortly after my tags expired on my vehicle. I had moved in the time period that property taxes are calculated (July 2006) and thus had not received my property tax bill from Harrison County, and did not have records on file for Mineral County. I knew that I needed to renew my tags, but had neglected to do so as I hate paying my property taxes 2 months early just to renew my tags. The Sherriff's office helped me to find my bill, but phone payment was not an option. I was going to be passing through Harrison county in the next week, so I decided to pay in person on my way to Charleston. While I waited to get the highly coveted paid receipt so that I could renew my tags my wife had a baby. I drove my vehicle between Keyser and Oakland in order to watch my daughter at home and be with my wife and new baby at the hospital. On the final trip I was pulled over by a MD state trooper because one of my three brake lights was out. He noticed that my tags had expired earlier in the month and wrote a $60 citation for expired WV tags. I took the ticket because, like most, I am an easy target for the police to pull over and fine. I still don't understand why I should pay MD $60 when I had been working on the issue, which in WV is not as easy as going to the DMV and paying to renew your tags. It takes several steps and visits to the assessors office, the sheriff's office, and then the DMV to get your tags renewed. I believe that a WV trooper would have understood and possibly cut me a little slack since my wife had just had a baby 2 days prior.

Next, a recently discharged employee and WV resident filed for MD unemployment. I questioned why the filing was in MD and asked how this could affect me since I don't have a MD unemployment account. I was given a phone number to call and proceeded to do so on 3 occasions. After 1/2 hour wait times I would hang up in order to continue working. Today I was called by MD Unemployment and threatened with a fine if I did not immediately fax the form that I received back to them. Correction: a staff member was told to pass this message on to me and direct me to immediately return their call. I explained why I had not already done this ( I needed to know what, if any affect this would have on my payroll withholdings and whether this would create a MD unemployment account), to which I received vague answers of "it won't, don't worry about it", and an explanation that wait times for their division are usually fairly long. I went ahead and faxed the form to avoid a fine and penalty from our neighbor to the north. Yet another unpaid obligation that is levied against small business people. It took roughly 1/2 hour to complete the form and fax it, plus the 2 hours of phone calls. I am tempted to send an invoice to MD for services rendered. Perhaps I can get my $60 vehicle fine back.

Senate candidate Howell signs no-tax pledge

Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Gary Howell

Tuesday, February 26, 2008 304 790 9292

Senate candidate Howell signs no-tax pledge

KEYSER — Gary Howell, Republican candidate for the 14^th State Senate District, today announced he has signed the State Taxpayer Protection Pledge, promising to “oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes.”

The pledge is promoted by Americans for Tax Reform, which was founded in 1985 by Grover Norquist at the request of President Reagan.

“Promising to oppose taxes is an easy call for me,” said Howell. “The people of West Virginia are already over-taxed and over-regulated. Burdensome taxation stifles growth and smothers entrepreneurship. By reducing and cutting taxes, our economy will grow and good jobs will come to the 14^th District and the rest of the state.”

Howell knows about growing a small business. For more than 17 years, he has been the owner and operator of Howell Automotive in Keyser, a leading supplier of auto parts. In 2003, Gary was named “Exporter of the Year” by the U.S. Small Business Administration. He was honored by the West Virginia Motor Sports Council in 2005 for promoting West Virginia across the country. Last year, he was honored with the Governors Commendation for International Market Entry, recognizing his success in completing sales with the Philippines, South Africa, Aruba, Belgium, Greece, Spain and Sweden.

A lifelong West Virginian, Howell received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Management from Frostburg State University's School of Business in 1990. He is seeking the Senate seat being vacated by Jon Blair Hunter.

The 14^th Senate district covers all or parts of the counties of Barbour, Grant, Mineral, Monongalia, Preston, Taylor and Tucker.

Rob Kessel

As many of you know local business man Rob Kessel perished in a plane crash last week. I served with Rob Kessel on the Mineral County Planning Commission and got to know him.

He served the community in many ways that were seen and many that were unseen. When he served on the County Planning Commission he had a good eye for looking out for the public welfare. His various housing and commercial projects around the area greatly benefited the local economy.

May God bless your family and friends. You will be missed.

You never get a second chance

Keith Funkhouser addressed the Keyser Lions Club last night. He is the GM for Allegheny Balistics Lab here in Mineral County. This was the first time I had learned about ABL and what they do. It is amazing that an organization like this exists here in Mineral County. The engineering is astounding. Keith, a native of Mineral County, cares deeply for the area and it is impressive to have him at the helm.

The question was raised about how ABL would fare in the post-Senator Byrd era. The answer was fairly in depth, but centered around the idea of building relationships with the new politicians in Washington to make sure that money keeps coming out to Mineral County. What strikes me the most is that by the time the post-Byrd era comes about, there is planned to be so much investment in the facility that it's role is critical and the contracts facility will continue to expand and grow. The ownership/lease structure of the property is set in such a way to hopefully continue the planned growth of the facility.

Keith also brought up some politically correct challenges to Mineral County to invest in our infrastructure and development. His challenge came with an "If you build it, they will come" tone when discussing the people that they are recruiting and the expectations of people looking to re-locate to Mineral County. This was the second time I had heard this same concern. Earlier in the day, Heather Ack from American Woodmark, spoke of the challenges that her company has when recruiting management candidates away from more urban areas. Come to think of it, Mineral County Schools have expressed similar struggles when recruiting teachers to the area.

My wife and I found this to be true when we recently relocated to the area. Mineral County simply does not make a very good first impression. When re-locating, many people like to go on a self-tour of the area and see where they would be living. My wife and I tried this, we drove up and down 220 and looked around the only housing areas we could find which were just off of Main St and West End. It can be daunting to take the cut off road, or head out on 46 not knowing where you are headed when you don't know the area. We also drove around the other side of the border and found the Cumberland area much closer to what we were used to seeing in our home towns. It isn't that those areas don't exist, you just have to know where to look in Mineral County.

Our plan had been to find a couple of neighborhood's we liked, then return home and pull up home listings on the computer to find a place to live. We knew that we would only had one planned visit to the area before buying a house and our self tour was going to be the key in finding the neighborhood that we chose to move to. We were determined to live on this side of the border, so we made some un-scheduled trips back and toured with realtors and other locals who showed us all of the areas that are just out of sight. Each one was progressively better and we found ourselves excited about re-locating to Mineral County and the neighborhood that we found. Turns out, our home is only about 1/8 mile off of 220, but without guidance, we never would have seen our neighborhood. Our experience is not unique and I have had discussions with several clients who re-located to the area and found this same challenge.

Perhaps we could establish a welcome website through the Chamber of Commerce that could help potential movers find the communities and hometown features that make Mineral County a great place to live. The site could also have a cost of living calculator to help people understand that their pay cut can actually be net gain. Recent movers/residents could suggest restaurants to try, places to go, etc. There are some unique attributes to this part of the country, and a welcome center or website could help to give our potential future neighbors a true first impression of the area.

Oh Deer! A Lesson in the Freedom Market

I’m sure you have heard the saying, “there is no such thing as a free lunch.” Whoever came up with that saying had a working understanding of economics. That person understood that somewhere along the line that free lunch was paid for by somebody. Unfortunately many elected officials in Charleston do not understand this most basic of free market economic facts.

Recently State Delegate Ralph Rodighiero (D-Logan) introduced bill H.B. 4498, in an effort to reduce out of pocket insurance expenses of those hitting deer on the states highways. The bill states, “Any person striking a deer on a state highway shall not be liable for repair costs exceeding two hundred dollars regardless of the amount of the deductible required from their motor vehicle insurance policy.” H.B. 4498 is a free lunch bill and somebody is going to have to pay for it.

Those of us that understand economics know exactly who is going to pay for this free lunch. It will be the person purchasing the insurance. The very same person that Delegate Rodighiero’s bill is supposed to reduce cost. Like all businesses, the insurance companies are in business to make a profit. Insurance companies will not simply absorb the cost of fixing the car of every West Virginian that hits a deer without charging the policy holder for the additional coverage that this bill will require.

Currently in West Virginia you are required to have a minimum of liability coverage on your vehicle. H.B. 4498 by default will require all insurance companies in West Virginian’s to sell nothing less than comprehensive (covers deer) with a $200 deductible.

I called my insurance agent to find out what this free lunch would cost. On a 2004 Dodge Pick-Up the difference between carrying liability coverage and a $200 deductible comprehensive is an increase of over $360 a year. Just dropping the deductible on an existing comprehensive policy from $1000 to the proposed requirement of $200 would increase the cost of that same policy over $110 a year. It is easy to see who is going to pay for this free lunch.

The real problem with H.R. 4498 is it that it assumes that West Virginian’s are not able to handle freedom of choice. It assumes that we are not able to make wise financial decisions on our own. The truth is we are able to make those choices and we can do a better job that government can. We understand that if we have a 1989 Cavalier that is only worth $500, it makes no sense to carry a $200 deductible comprehensive insurance policy. We may wish to pick $1000 deductible instead of $200 if we are willing to take that greater financial risk. The economic free market has provided us all with choices in auto insurance. As a result, Delegate Rodighiero is free choosing to purchase $200 deductible insurance on his own, but it will be his choice not the governments.

H.R. 4498 simple takes away our freedom of choice. If passed we will no longer be able pick our insurance based on our need or financial ability. For most West Virginian’s, they will be forced to pick more expensive insurance that they may not be able to afford, want, or need. Government decisions like this one that are not based on sound economic principles or freedom of choice are one of the very reasons West Virginia ranks at bottom of the good economic categories. We must change.

Perception and Leadership

I was speaking to former Helping Hands director Cheri Alt the other day. She was discussing the issue of how the middle class is perceived to be shrinking. Alt described how the perception of the middle class most people have appears almost unobtainable to many poor. The effort to reach the next level is overwhelming. This has helped to create a strong perception that America is somehow out of whack and needs some kind of serious adjustment.

First, this made me wonder. What is "middle class?"

It used to be that middle class meant that you had a reliable roof over your head, a decent automobile, and the capability to feed your family and pay your bills. After this, you usually had a little left over every month to save for retirement and a vacation. Sure bills caused stress, but more often than not the family did just fine. Until recently, this was not just middle class, but "the American Dream." This middle class still exists in America. The problem lies in what people perceive as "success." We have revised it upward. Now we don't see ourselves as successful unless we can afford all the latest electronics, a house much larger than necessary, new automobiles, and still not worry about bills. The gap between expectations and reality causes anxiety to many. We stress about what we do not have rather than being thankful for the gifts God gave us. I make the same mistake myself very often.

The media does not help. Its views of middle class have been skewed for a long time. Shows like Roseanne, Mama's Family, and Sanford and Son were meant to represent people who in some way were poor. However all had homes and vehicles. Fred Sanford was even a small business owner. Bill Cosby represented middle class, although to many of us in West Virginia, he certainly appeared rich. The Democrats play upon this anxiety when they announce that the United States has a poor economy.

An expectation of rewards without effort, experience, or proof of competency has also helped create the perception that the economy and society itself has problems. The burgeoning sense of entitlement is the sad result of the 1990s liberal experiment with scholastic self-esteem. Children learned that they were all considered excellent regardless of whether they earned it in any way. The same awards went to everyone regardless of whether the individual had actually done something worthwhile. Effort was given the same praise as competency. Students find a rude awakening when they hit college or real life. The shock comes when professors or employers expect actual results, an end rarely demanded before unless the youngster played in athletics or band.

The liberals demand equality of outcome and they offer government as the solution. Achieve too effectively and watch them cut you down to size. If people get left behind it becomes an indication that something is inherently wrong. No other country in history offers opportunity like the United States in the 21st century, if only people will stand up and seize their chances through hard work from the first they they hit adulthood. We just need to remember as individuals that nothing worthwhile comes without struggle and few lessons are remembered better than those learned because of failure. We also need to thank God for the good things in our lives. We may work hard towards certain goals, but American values do not include a guarantee.

*********************************************************************

Isn't it amazing that even though the Left has dominated higher education for at least the past three decades, the Republican Party continues to turn out better candidates for leadership in presidential elections? Perhaps the universities of practical business (Romney), military style character (John McCain), the school of hard knocks (Mike Huckabee), etc. do a better job creating leaders than academia. It could also reflect the fact that conservatives constantly must defend their principles and beliefs against established authorities while in school. This forces conservatives to think about what they believe in and why. The result is a much more reasonable and capable leader, as opposed to a guy who throws out inane causal linkages and expects them to be believed without question.

When listening to liberal Democrats, always question the assumptions they make in their arguments. It is here, at the foundation, that their logic always fails. They rely on ideas such as collective guilt, conservative or private sector greed as a primary motivating factor, conservative lack of insight as a truth, the idea that individuals pursuing their own success are somehow immoral, the concept that global warming is an acknowledged truth. If you accept their assumptions, their logic is fine and their conclusions are valid. It is their assumptions that defy reality. Take for example the economy. Obama insists we need significant change because the economy is poor. The economy is still growing! Furthermore the Fed says it will pick up by fall. Get your time machine and bring someone in from the 1970s or 1930s and ask them if 2% growth with low interest rates and inflation are bad. That looks like heaven to those folks.

*********************************************************************

A hundred years ago, hucksters sold products called patent medicines. These drugs promised to cure what ailed you, but never informed the customer what composed them. Obama's campaign works on a similar premise. It promises to make you feel better while refusing to offer any substance. Turns out these medicines did make people feel better in the short term because they were chock full of morphine. People get convinced to take the medicines even when they are not ill because the salesmen were extremely slick. A little exercise and better diet would have gone a lot farther than patent medicines.

Republicans offer the reasonable path to a better tomorrow because individuals are expected to work towards their own benefit. Obama offers the patent medicine of government solutions without any expectation of individuals. That's not how this country was founded and built into greatness.

Heathergate in the "DA"

The Daily Athenaeum, the WVU student newspaper, has been doing a bang up job reporting on Heathergate at WVU.

Last week, they even extracted a semi-confession from a WVU official "

Here is the latest they are reporting today.

WVU faculty, admin. differ about eMBA

and

‘Degree-gate’ dragging on

I was really inclined to give the University the benefit of the doubt in this matter, but I have yet to see any exculpatory evidence in this matter whatsoever.

There hasn't seemed to be anything to indicate that the allegations are false, and a whole laundry list of distortions and misstatements by WVU officials. I find it hard to believe that this will end well.

Failure of Imagination

Barack Hussein Obama recently accused his Democratic opponents, the Republican Party, and everyone else in Washington DC of a "failure of imagination." In Barack Hussein Obama's world, economic cycles do not exist and bad decisions have no consequences. In Obamaland, government is responsible for all the good and bad of society. Since the economy has hit a difficult patch (mind you, we are not even in a recession) Obama has taken the opportunity to say that everyone in the United States government with the exception of him is responsible for mortgage lenders and buyers making less than sound choices. To boot, they are also responsible for General Motors' poor judgment and bad luck as well. Of course the reason why General Motors and the mortgage market are in hard times are, you guessed it, the "failed" war in Iraq.

And you wonder why Clintoncrats and Republicans question this man's worthiness for office. Liberals jumped on George W. Bush in 2000 for failing to know the name of the leader of Pakistan. Obama fails to understand the economy of the United States, or that the war in Iraq is winding down and (surprise, surprise, surprise) we have achieved most of our goals.

Obama supporters don't tend to care that he has little experience or understanding. They say he is a smart guy and he promises change. Assuredly Obama has brains; you can't get to the United States Senate without them. Knowing how to sell a product does not mean you ought to run the company. And what about change? Change can be good or bad. We certainly need change in terms of more deregulation, a simpler tax code, an energy vision that lays more emphasis on domestic production, and many other ideas championed by President Bush but rejected by the last weak willed Republican Congress.

We don't need a guy who thinks government is the end all and be all of this country. Republicans believe change should also come from individuals who dedicate themselves to taking advantages of the opportunities presented by this great country of ours. We are descended from people who did not wait to be handed their success, they aggressively pursued and earned it. The death of the American work ethic comes from us looking to someone other than ourselves. Voting for Obama only furthers that process.

Insurance isn't the problem

http://www.register-herald.com/local/local_story_043205045.html

This is an interesting story as it highlights one of the fundamental problems with our government. A complete lack of understanding of how businesses operate. There is a bill being presented by Delegate Ralph Rodighiero, D-Logan to regulate deductibles in deer losses to a maximum of $200. So, in plain English, you get hit by a deer, the most you can pay out of pocket is $200. The rest is up to the insurance companies...which is to say that your fellow policyholders will see increased premium to offset the additional cost of this new deductible.

Let's set a few things straight...

1) There is no such thing as "deer coverage". Deer damage is covered by comprehensive coverage. Comprehensive coverage covers damages to your vehicle through losses Other than collision, such as damage by fire, theft, falling objects, storms, collision with birds or animals, and glass breakage. Basically, you didn't do anything wrong as a driver, but your car is damaged and the insurance company needs to fix it. The article does not indicate whether or not ALL comprehensive losses would see a cap on the deductible, or if we are expecting insurance companies to create a new "deer" coverage that will be used to cover just this specific peril.

2) Rodighiero is cited as acknowledging that he won't endear himself to insurance companies with this proposal and states “I’m not here for the insurance companies or the big-dollar people,” he said.“I’m here for the common problems we have as West Virginians. I’ve dedicated myself to doing that and that’s what I’m going to continue to do.”

A noble point, but as an insurance agent, I get paid on a percentage basis. So if you raise everyone's rates across the board, I have not lost my competitive edge, but my income is going to go up. I am not objecting to this because it would cost me money, it would be financially beneficial to my agency, but it is not the place of the government. IF Mr Rodighiero feels bad about deer accidents he should be suggesting a deer control plan, or a government program to re-imburse drivers for deductibles paid for deer losses out of state funds. Afterall, the state is unwilling to control the deer problem in part because it is a way to bring hunters and their money from other states each year. Raise the hunting license cost a couple hundred dollars to offset the reimbursement program, so that all the non-hunters don't pay for the surge in deer each year.

3) The REAL problem is not the deductible, it's not the insurance rate, it's the fact that your constituents, like many Americans, bought a car they can't afford. We see this all the time. The fact of the matter is that this is an optional coverage, you don't have to buy it in order to own or buy a car. You don't even have to fix your car in a deer collision. Granted your car will look bad and/or may not function, but you could just park it. Unless of course your bank requires it as a condition for your car loan. Unfortunately, we see this everyday. Too many people are stuck with car loans that they can't afford because they did not account for the other costs of a car; such as gas, oil, maintenance, insurance, fuzzy dice, etc and the inevitable increase in these costs over the seven years that they financed their car.

My solution when this problem hit me was simple...I sold my expensive cars and bought less expensive, less shiny cars that were well within my budget. I know it isn't always easy, it took us almost a year to get to where we could afford to pay off the loan on one of our cars in order to trade down, but it eventually worked and we now have a firm policy of staying off of the car lots. It is about personal accountability. The car you buy, the amount you pay, who you buy insurance from, which coverages/deductibles you carry... all of these decisions are made by the individual. I don't want to pay for a $200 deductible, I chose a $500 deductible, a law like this would take away my ability to choose and force me to pay more for a lower deductible. Thanks Charleston, but if it is OK I would like to make a few decisions on my own.

Killing the Golden Goose

As global demand for energy rises, West Virginia is poised to take advantage through use of our abundant energy resources. West Virginia has produced oil and natural gas continually since the 1800’s. Our mountains allow us to efficiently produce electricity from both hydroelectric and wind energy, but coal is still the energy Golden Goose to the states economy.

Unfortunately instead of feeding and caring for the Golden Goose most of the time the state stalks the Golden Goose like a predator using taxes as its favorite weapon. Some 200 years ago US Supreme Court Chief Justice and namesake of Marshall University, John Marshall warned, “The power to tax involves the power to destroy.” The evidence that Marshall was correct is all around us in West Virginia as we rank 50^th in business opportunity due to our punitive business tax structure destroying our economy.

The latest hunter taking aim at the Golden Goose is DEP Secretary Stephanie Timmermyer, who went before the Senate Finance Committee February 7^th requesting a state tax on coal be doubled. West Virginia is already at a huge economic disadvantage and this will only add more. We have the 7^th highest tax rate in the nation and at the same time we rank 49^th in per capita income. The destruction of the states economy through a punitive tax structure has dropped the states population from 1.3% of the US population in 1950 to 0.6% today, a drop of more than half.

Simple economics explains how the global coal market will respond if the coal tax increase is enacted. West Virginia coal will become more expensive in the market place. Just as we shop for the lowest price on food or gasoline, those in the coal market will also shop for the lowest price of coal. That will put West Virginia coal producers at a disadvantage. It will be harder for them to be price competitive. New coal orders will drop as a result. The drop in orders will mean less need for manpower, transportation, and supplies further increasing the adverse effects on the West Virginia economy.

Secretary Timmermyer’s request for an increase in coal taxes personifies the problem with Charleston’s understanding of the economy. Ronald Reagan clearly identified the problem when he stated, "The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the problem is that government spends too much." West Virginian’s have been taxed so heavily for so long that a large unused surplus exists in various state accounts. In 2005 State Senator Russ Weeks estimated that at $1 billion, Senator Herb Snyder at $3 billion, and West Virginians Want to Know at $5 billion. When the state has somewhere between $1 and $5 billion dollars sitting unused in various accounts; we should not be talking about raising taxes.

With world demand for energy high and West Virginia sitting on coal, oil, gas, hydroelectric and wind to supply the world, tax cuts are in order to help our economy grow. The money not spent on taxes will be plowed back into the businesses of the state thus feeding the Golden Goose. If the power to tax is the power to destroy, then the power to reduce taxes is the power to create.