I'd like to thank President Eisenhower!

I recently completed a business trip to Nevada for the annual SEMA trade show. That is the largest trade show in the world and it just happens to be in the industry that I am in. Unlike most people that flew to the trade show, I chose to drive.

Yes you read that right. I drove from Keyser, WV to Las Vegas, NV. 2300 miles out in 35 hours, and 2300 miles back in 36 hours. We switch off drivers and drive non-stop. That would not have been possible just 40 years ago.

In 1919 a then Lt. Eisenhower was involved in a military experiment. A convoy left Washington, DC in route to San Fransisco, CA. It took over 2 months to drive across the nation. The roads were horrible. An excellent book American Road by Pete Davies chronicles the trip. I highly recommend reading it. Today you can drive that same trip in 48 hours by switching drivers.

In 1945 then General Eisenhower saw the Autobahns in Germany and how easily it was to move transport. The combination of those events in Eisenhower's life led to him signing the Defense Highways Act in 1956, which created the Interstate Highway System we enjoy today.

While we complain about the road construction, we have one of the best highway systems in the world. Sometimes we tend to take that for granted. During my trip of close to 5,000 miles I encountered very few problems. On they way back Interstate 44 through Oklahoma City was probably the worse piece of road. West Virginia actually had some of the best sections of Interstate.

It is easy to see that roads are essential to commerce when you drive the nations interstate system. At night across Kansas and Colorado on the way out, and across New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma the road became almost the exclusive domain of heavy trucks. While the travelers mostly stop at night, commerce keeps right on rolling.

The Interstate system lead to the huge growth in the US Economy since World War II, and for the most part that system is working well. In West Virginia we face a crisis in roads and we need to solve the problem. As we go deeper into the 21st Century we will need to look at new ways of funding our highway system. We need make sure the WVDOH is properly funded, but we must also make sure they are spending funds wisely.

Presidential Prerogatives

Secrecy versus the right to know has grown into an important debate in terms of the restriction of presidential papers.

During the Watergate hangover years, lawmakers sought to reduce the aura of secrecy that existed around presidential papers. After Richard Nixon's administration, zealously guarded secrecy was seen as a catalyst for presidential misdeeds. Perhaps if presidential communications saw more scrutiny, they might themselves act in a more transparent manner. Additionally historians rejoiced in the idea that they could access crucial records more quickly.

The last two presidents have come under fire for restricting access to their papers. The New York Times recently blasted President Bush for adhering to a family "mania for secrecy." Five years ago he wrote an executive order placing many of his personal papers under restriction for the immediate future. During recent Democratic debates, Hillary Clinton's competition of stuffed shirts blasted her refusal to release her personal correspondence between herself and her husband. Historians despise both measures because they want access to these documents as soon as possible.

Historians may be hurting their own efforts. Our record of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia was locked up for fifty years so that the participants could speak freely. What if they believed their thoughts would appear in print within a few years? This would alter what was communicated and written down. Future historians will not have those rare finds of politicians actually communicating their real unguarded thoughts. Because Franklin D. Roosevelt did not trust that his papers would remain inviolate, he communicated everything through speaking. We rarely have any idea what was really on his mind at any given point.

Additionally personal papers, especially those between a husband and wife regardless of position, are personal. Hillary Clinton and her husband wrote things to each other on important issues that I personally would be interested in seeing. However these are personal communications and so long as no criminal investigation exists, these papers ought to remain private for the time being. They especially ought not be fodder during a presidential campaign.

George W. Bush's communications come during wartime, something that liberals and the media seem to haver perpetual ammnesia about. They reflect strategies and ideas that could help our enemies if released, even after his term is over. Again, this is a situation where historians want to write their books and political folks want mud to smear.

Bush and Clinton both deserve the right in the short term to limit access to their personal papers so long as there is an eventual date that everything end up in the public eye. It may be years, it may be decades, but that is the price we pay so that these people can feel free to record their thoughts.

Holding Taxes Down

It seems that politicians always want to raise taxes. The reason is they like to spend money. It is easy to spend money when it is not your own. What we need are laws to control spending for those politicians that forget they should take greater care when spending other peoples money.

The way to do it is to limit revenue. If government gets an increase in revenue, they just spend it. In Mineral County personal property taxes have increased substantially, and the government just spent it all.

I would suggest that any budget increases within the county be limited to the previous years budget plus inflation and population change. The government doesn't need to grow any faster than inflation. This limits government to its current size. Allowing for increases based on population also is reasonable. Any increase in population will require an increase in services, but not an increase that is greater than the growth rate.

Now if the government receives more money than the increase from inflation or population allows, then government will be required to give that money back to the tax payer in the form of refunds. After all it is our money they are taking, they should be giving the access back.

This has worked in other states and should work here to control out of control tax increases and government expansion. It is only common sense to not take to much from the taxpayer.

Septimus Severus

The 100s AD were a good time to be a Roman (unless you were a Christian.) For most people in that empire, times were good. Rome enforced peace with liberty throughout its realm. Prosperity reigned everywhere because the government did not exercise large amounts of influence in the economy relative to other societies at the time. Roman citizens often did not suffer from a heavy tax burden but had the freedom to make economic choices. From the 100s BC until almost 200 AD, Rome enjoyed a society where class distinctions did not inhibit the material movement of most citizens.

It is true that Rome did lose its republican government in the century before the birth of Christ, removing the right of the people to choose the government. For most of the first century AD Rome's political leadership ruled in turmoil. Only in the 100s did this stablilize. Despite these problems, the economic freedom of Romans continued.

Economic freedom is vital to the strength and resilience of the economy. People must enjoy the freedom to make choices with their money. When the government restricts these freedoms through taxation or burdensome regulation, it reduces the dynamic nature of the system. Emperor Septimus Severus in the late 100s and early 200s AD chose to drastically reduce Roman economic freedoms. He raises taxes considerably and passed restrictive laws. Just as the modern United States, Rome constructed public works and maintained a welfare state. Often these issues went beyond practical necessity and became political debates. Septimus Severus passed laws enforcing an idea that those in the lower class must stay in their status, restricting their opportunities to better themselves.

Modern America faces these same problems. Hillary Clinton and Congressional Democrats make a political issue out of President Bush refusing to let the government pay for middle class children to have health insurance. Not poor as the local and national media insist, but middle class! Poor children already receive insurance coverage. Only through much higher taxes will an initiative such as this become law. Local liberals want to pass laws that will increase the power of the government to harass and dispossess people of property if some other individual for whatever reason shows disapproval over how it looks.

Lower taxes and sound protections for property are two major pillars of a dynamic economy. Liberals around the country fear an economy left to its own devices and seek to introduce restrictive planning. As in 200s AD Rome or the Soviet Union, excessive planning only ensures that the poor stay poor.

How did Rome fare after Septimus Severus? For the next hundred years it experienced economic decline and political turmoil. Emperors rose and fell, trade dropped, and the stage was set for even more restrictions on liberty and the final fall of Rome. Citizens lost their faith in their country because opportunity declined. In Rome at its height and the United States today, any citizen enjoyed the opportunity to better themselves provided they were willing to work and make good choices. We need to band together to make sure we do not elect our own Septimus Severus Clinton in 2008.

Potomac Highlands Funding Presidential Candidates

The following information is from official public records of the Federal Election Commission


Democrats

• Hillary Clinton has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands

• Amy Carpenter, Romney Employer: American Woodmark Contribution: $75
• Kermit Garrettson, Keyser Employer: Keyser Inn Contribution: $350
• Robin Dolly, Moorefield Employer: Mountain Medical Contribution: $1000
• Joanne Webster, Mathias Employer: Information Requested Contribution: $500
• Victor Wulf, Baker Employer: Retired Contribution: $250

• John Edwards has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• Robert Mayhew, Romney Employer: Information Requested Contribution $2300
• Barack Obama has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• Robert Erber, Baker Employer: Information Requested Contribution $200
  

• Bill Richardson has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• Robert Alcock, Lost City Employer: Lost River Woodworking Contribution $250

Republicans

• Mitt Romney has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• Jeffery Hott, Franklin Employer: Hott's AG Service Contribution $350
• Edith Shankle, Bloomery Employer: Retired Contribution $1250
• Fred Dalton Thompson has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• David Maher, Milham Employer: Self-Employed Contribution $250
• John McCain has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• Carl Smith, Moorefield Employer: Retired Contribution $300
• Ron Paul has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• Jack Mullen, Keyser Employer: Starcast South Contribution $800
• James Landis, Peterburg Employer: Conquest Publishing Contribution $1000
• James Gillmore has received contributions from the following persons in the Potomac Highlands
• David Bookman, Romney Employer: Retired Contribution $500

All records are public and on file at the Federal Election Commission

Thank You Secretary of State

I recently converted to a new type of business. I must say that I was thoroughly impressed with how easy and FAST the entire process was. I have my new certificates in hand in under 5 business days. I was notified via email of each approval from the various departments involved. The website was fairly simple to navigate and use. Overall, I was very impressed...I guess we are Open For Business!!!



For more information on business registration visit http://www.business4wv.com/

Drought Response: Are we ready?

Prior to the recent rains the Potomac Highlands had been heading for a drought according to NOAA. The graphic explains how bad it was beginning to get here.

Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue has been on TV asking the Federal Government to stop the release of water from Federal dams and reservoirs . It seems that even though the area is in an extreme drought the government is releasing water faster than it is flowing into the dams. The reason is Department of Natural Resources and US Fish and Wildlife is still maintaining flow rates based on requirements for wildlife instead of people.

At what point do the people begin to be more important than the wildlife? The Potomac Highlands is in a drought right now. Ours has not been as long as the one in Georgia, but according to NOAA the short term is bad.

The state should have a mechanism in place that says to our DNR, when water resources become critical the people take priority.

Potomac Highlands Republican Dinner

The Potomac Highlands Republican Club is hosting a dinner in Romney on Saturday November 3rd at 6 PM at the old Bottling Works.

Secretary of State Betty Ireland will be the keynote speaker and Senator Dave Sypolt will host the event. Senator Clark Barnes and GOP strategist Gary Abernathy will also speak on Republican issues. Guests include elected and party leaders from across the region and the state. Representatives from the office of Congresswoman Shelley Moore Capito and the major presidential campaigns will be on hand.

All are invited regardless of party to share in a good time and to meet state leaders. Tickets are $25. Please contact Christy Barnett at 304-790-0522 or Stephen Smoot at 304-788-1573 or smoot.stephen@gmail.com

*******************************************************************

The dinner kicks off the creation of the Potomac Highlands Republican Club. This new organization will try and mobilize Republicans in Pendleton, Grant, Hardy, Hampshire, and Mineral counties. The club's goals are to strengthen the party and support candidates. Many voters care about certain issues but do not get involved for a variety of reasons. The club wants to involve everyone who has an interest whether they can help out for a few hours per week or a few hours per month. Vast potential exists in the growing Potomac Highlands to become a key part of Republican success in West Virginia.

Some Presidential Candidates may not be legal Candidates in WV

Presidential Candidates must be registered as members of the party that nominate them according the West Virginia state code. Since the code was amended in 1991 it has not been enforced. This means that presidential candidates George Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and H. Ross Perot were all illegally placed on the ballot.

Secretary of State Betty Ireland believes that the law is unconstitutional, but has no choice but to enforce it until it is declared unconstitutional. The Mountain Party of West Virginia plans to challenge the law in the courts.

If the law is not found unconstitutional, then some presidential candidates names may not appear on the ballot in May. This could include Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee, and others.

Shush!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Last week the Mineral County Republican Executive Committee voted on a resolution. Very rarely does this body make a specific statement on county policy. However it did encourage the Mineral County Commission "to oppose any additional requirements placed on building construction in Mineral County." This included additional fees and regulations above and beyond the state code.

They did not sacrifice a cat on the courthouse lawn, or anything similarly outrageous but you would not have believed it by the response of the county commissioners. Janice LaRue responded responsibly by saying she would look out for the good of the county rather than simply one political party. Fair enough.

However Cindy Pyles registered her extreme disappointment over the resolution and aimed her comments at two Republicans in particular. "I am really very disappointed in Bob Harman's signature, as a former commissioner," she said. Pyles then named who she thought was the true malefactor of this horrific deed when she stated, "This has the hand writing of Gary Howell all over it."

Horror of horrors and right before Halloween at that! Imagine the gall of Gary Howell, Bob Harman, or the Republican Executive Committee expressing an opinion! It must have been so disappointing for Cindy Pyles to hear a Republican organization expressing its own party's principles of less government and less financial burdens on citizens.

The problem with liberals is that they often see their views as the truth. They feel that if a person just uses their faculties of reason, that they will also arrive at the same conclusions. No room exists for rational disagreement in this world view. If a conservative disagrees they are either uninterested in progressive government, or selfish, or stupid. There is no thought that a conservative could have a valid and reasonable objection.

Conservatives have principles based on reason, logic, and American tradition. They should not let the disappointment of liberal county commissioners dissuade them from speaking their minds on what is right.

WV Slogan

Governor Manchin's slogan of "Open for Business" has proven immensely unpopular. I'll admit that it is a little goofy, but There is now a site to vote on the new slogan. I had noticed that "Open for Business" never made it onto the license plates of West Virginians, so I guess it is not going to make it. The choices offered are

Almost Heaven

The Mountain State

Wild, Wonderful

http://www.wva.state.wv.us/wv_slogan/default.aspx

The questions that I have is this, how much is all the moving and shaking of the signage/ slogan changing going to cost the people of WV? And, is it worth the effort?

WVGOP Convention Format Favors.......Ron Paul?

Much has been written (much less has been understood) about the West Virginia GOP's new convention format for selecting at-large national convention delegates. I won't try to explain the entire process right now, but basically each county (based upon a formula) is allocated a certain number of delegates to the state convention. Those delegates to the state convention, in turn, will meet in Charleston on Tuesday, February 5, 2008 to cast votes for one of the 10 Republican candidates that have elected to participate. The winning campaign will then name 18 individuals to serve as West Virginia's at-large delegates to the Republican National Convention.

For purposes of this post, the important thing to understand about the state convention is that victory will go to the candidate best able to mobilize and turnout its supporters. Fund raising doesn't matter. National polls matter even less.

The winning candidate will identify the number of "public" delegates available to each county, and will find (through e-mail lists, coalition groups, or other networks) enough people to fill those slots. There will likely only be a handful of counties where there are competitive elections in the races for Delegate to the State Convention; in most of the counties, anyone who files to be a delegate will likely be a delegate. In that scenario, whichever campaign recruits delegates to file for the state convention can just rack up those votes. The very serious campaigns will even consider paying the $25 filing fee for their people to run.

In addition, I suspect that most counties will end up forgoing the county caucus process and select county "public" delegates strictly online. In this way, the Ron Paul campaign may have an advantage. It is becoming a recurring storyline through the campaign how Ron Paul is a phenomenon on the Internet; he has a network of very dedicated followers who flood message boards and online polls. If he has enough people in the state to put up some delegates (which is a monumental "if"), I would suspect that he also has enough people to show a significant online presence for purposes of voting.

I have a feeling that we'll have a good idea who will be the winner of this convention on November 30. That's the last date to register to run for delegate, and its the last day to register to vote online. In counties where there is no county caucus (which will likely be most counties), that's the end of the game.

We might just see that this new experiment has provided a golden opportunity for a dark horse.

Brickstreet needs Repaving

One of the main things, and one of the things we can actually fix, keeping businesses from locating in West Virginia is our high workers comp rates. Let's face it when you choose a place to locate your business you go to the place with the lowest prices.

I can look out the window across the river into Maryland, and about 2000 feet away is substantially lower workers comp rate for my business. However I believe in keeping everything in my home state, so I stay, even at a competitive disadvantage.

Now July 1, 2008 Brickstreet will no longer be the only game in town, but their is an issue tied to that. I will get to that in a minute. Right now Brickstreet is a government created monopoly, and most businesses in West Virginia have been receiving increasing rates from Brickstreet. We have no choice, but to pay them or cease operations. It is nothing more than government sponsored extortion.

What upsets most of us business owners is the fact that Brickstreet is advertising. Why? Nobody can compete with them by law. Why do you need to advertise when you're the only game in town by law? That is just wasting money of the owners of Brickstreet and hurting its clients. We pay higher rates to cover needless advertising!

Now on July 1st, 2008 other companies are allowed to offer workers comp insurance, but their is a catch. The competitors are only allowed to price 5% lower than Brickstreet. This is nothing more than price supports for insurance.

Price supports do nothing more than cost consumers more money. Only the Free Market gives the consumer the best price. These price supports are nothing more than corporate welfare for Brickstreet. They will keep wages lower in West Virginia, because if they company has to pay more for insurance, then that is less they can pay the employee.

We must open up Workers Comp up to real competition in the state, so that we can all benefit and not just the fat cats running Brickstreet.

Commissioner's Report

One of our County Commissioners, Cindy Pyles, spoke to the Lion's Club about the various goings on in the County on Thursday, October 18, 2007. A lot seems to be happening, but two specific items troubled me and I am hoping to get some clarification.

Keyser Fire Department - When I moved to Keyser in April 2006, I knew precious little about the new bridge, except that it would take out the fire department and the building that housed the business I had just purchased. I assumed, wrongly, that the new fire hall near Airport Addition was to be the "new" home of the Keyser VFD. Apparently that is not the case as the Keyser VFD will be relocated to a new facility somewhere. I came from a town about 5x the size of Keyser that had 1 fire hall and a superb paid fire department. I was confused as to why Keyser needs two separate stations 1 mile apart? Several county fire departments are rated better than Keyser for insurance purposes (New Creek and Fountain as two examples). That means that your insurance in Keyser is rated higher than if you had the same house in the New Creek District or Fountain District. Confused as to why the fire department would use their resources to fund two separate houses I asked a fellow Lion why this was. The explanation was that the City owned the building downtown, but the fire department owns the one up by airport...? I don't get it, so I probed, if my house in Airport Addition (Keyser City Limits) catches fire...who comes to put it out? Well, apparently both fire houses would respond??? They are approximately 1 mile apart. The volunteers at one likely pass the other fire hall to get suited up and on the truck then backtrack to my house. Why don't we go to one fire hall, use the excess funds to pay a full time staff member or two, boost the fire department rating, and save everyone some insurance money? Keep in mind I am paid as an insurance agent a percentage of the cost of your policy, so this plan would result in a pay cut for me. But I feel that it makes sense. Can anyone better explain the need for two fire halls.

Second, talk turned to the 911 response center. I was still trying to get answers on the fire department, so I may have missed something, but it seems that the 911 center is being built up by Keyser High School. Commissioner Pyles was asked if this is being built on a cemetery. It was the one time I saw her transform into a politician and "To the best of her knowledge the only cemetery was down the road and not the site for the 911 center". I smiled. Then the question became, who owns that land. Obviously, the county, right...wrong! The response indicated that the county is building a county services building on land that they do not own and are not intending to acquire. huh? I am sure that with a 99 year lease and some other legal provisions this could make perfect sense. A lease would not require a capital investment for the purchase of land, it could save up front costs, it could be the difference in the need for a levy (tax) or a bond issue, if the county has enough to build a building but not to acquire land and build a building. It could be a lease with a purchase option to delay the need for purchase capital. A whole slew of possibilities, but no one pursued this, no answer came, and I did not feel the need to pursue the question. It could be the only way to locate near the school which likely already has the infrastructure needs to support a call center. Here's to hoping that the commission has done their due diligence before selecting this spot.

Overall, I will say that I was impressed by my first meeting with Cindy Pyles. She was knowledgeable about all of the projects going on, she held the attention of the room, was political when needed, and (despite a lack of sleep and teaching young minds during the day) seemed to be genuinely interested in the projects that were going on.

God Bless.

Ted Kennedy to Introduce Legislation Condemning Italy

Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy's spokesperson announced this morning that he will introduce legislation condemning Italy for an act of genocide in its past.

In the mid 100s AD, the Roman Republic launched an aggressive war against the militarily vulnerable city-state of Carthage. Its armies marched into the city, destroyed every building, murdered every civilian, and even sowed salt into the surrounding fields so nothing would grow in them. Rome's brutality marked the largest single massacre of a civilian population until World War II. Neither the Roman Republic, nor its successor the Roman Empire, nor the current Republic of Italy have acknowledged or apologized for this act of brutality. Kennedy said that it is time to redress the wrongs of history. Italy can start with an apology to the current government of Tunisia, then negotiate reparations.

Obviously this is a sham article, but it is not too far off the mark from a real issue. Democrats in Congress have proposed a statement of condemnation against the current Republic of Turkey for atrocities committed by the Ottoman Empire. Turkey rightly refuses to apologize for the actions of another government. President Bush would rather Congress not antagonize one of our few real Muslim allies that is also a long standing democracy.

This becomes a slippery slope. In all honesty we would have to condemn the United Kingdom for their Boer War concentration camps, France for some of their colonial practices, and many others. Condemnations and apologies for historical events make little sense. The current generation does not own the guilt of acts committed before they were even born. Yes this counts Japan and Germany as well. Our sense of justice is supposed to be individual. People commit crimes and need punishment; nations are not culpable to the end of time just because their history has some stain.

The proposed resolution against Turkey is tantamount to forcing an individual to apologize for the crimes of their great-grandfather. There is no point to it, nor fairness in it.

*********************************************************************

Add this to the file of "if they had a gun, they would have been fine." In Great Britain, a family was attacked and beaten because they put details of their son's 16th birthday party on YouTube. Over 100 uninvited guests showed up at the residence and demanded entry. They attacked the father and beat everyone else while stealing food and champagne.

A shotgun full of rock salt or wood splinters would have dispersed that mob right away. It would not even happen in West Virginia.

The Fed, good or bad?

Even with a Finance degree I am just starting to learn about the monetary system in our country. Here are a couple of articles that I will be reading. The question I find fascinating is this: Congress is given the power to print, i.e. "create" money. However this is actually being performed by the Federal Reserve Bank (and I thought they just played with my interest rates...). So, instead of printing our own money, the government is outsourcing this task to the Fed, then selling bonds (think of this as getting a loan) from the same bank. That's all well and good, but those bonds (loans) come with interest. Who pays the interest accumulated? You and I pay it in the form of taxes. Some of what I read indicates that this is as much as 40% of your income taxes going to pay interest on these "loans".

Quick summary, the government needs money so it borrows money from the federal reserve that will be paid back with interest. The federal reserve then asks the government to print the money that they need to loan to the government. Then the Fed charges interest to the government which is paid by your tax dollar.

Wouldn't it be better to simply tell congress to print their own money and stop outsourcing this job for an interest based charge? If you were taught like I was, you were taught that this was done to avoid a conflict of interest on the part of a politician leading he/she to print a bunch of money shortly before election day. Everyone is happy in November, then the country faces huge inflation. Although this isn't much different from the Fed creating a bunch of money on behalf of that politician it does take the accountability off of the Fed and pass the interest on to some of our countries wealthiest families. Afterall, who do you think owns America's banks.

Two possible solutions, First, the Fed should charge a one time fee for its money printing services each year. The job should be left out to bid and awarded to the best company for the job. I am fully aware that this company will make money and they most likely won't be the lowest bidder, it is politics after all. Then again, it would be easy for Americans to find out that they were paying billions if not trillions each year for a private company to decide how much money we should print this year. Keep in mind that the actual printing is done by the government, the Fed is just getting paid for saying how much to print and what interest rate they will charge for that determination. That is the kind of clarity we need from our government right now.

Possible Second solution, get rid of the system. Congress, print your own money and face the people every two or six years if you screw this up! Don't whine that it is too touchy for elected officials to be involved with, so are tax increases, public health care, national defense, and a host of other topics but our elected officials seem to manage to get involved in those areas...what's one more? Roll up your sleeves and earn that lifelong paycheck.

This whole issue is just complex enough to ward off most nosy taxpayers that would question the system. Combine this with the fact that the Federal Reserve Bank, The IRS, and the income tax were founded in the same year, things are a little fishy. Tack on the fact that purchasing the bonds created in the system provides a tax incentive (perhaps a nice word for bribe) to investors who might question the system and we have all the makings of a nice conspiracy. I look forward to reading more about this topic. I hope it turns out to be the best possible solution to the difficult job of determining monetary policy, but it is our job to constantly question those that serve as our representatives and even those that they partner with. I have a few links to articles that I will be reading below. God Bless

http://www.maxexchange.com/ybj/chapter2.htm

http://www.justiceplus.org/bankers.htm

http://www.scribd.com/doc/63639/The-Federal-Reserve-is-Privately-Owned-by-Thomas-D-Schauf

http://batr.org/markets/federalreserve.html

http://www.reformation.org/federal-reserve.html

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul53.html

http://www.bigeye.com/griffin.htm

http://www.maxexchange.com/ybj/chapter18.htm

Romney Devoting Full-time Staffer to West Virginia

Governor Mitt Romney's campaign for the Republican presidential nomination has brought Wendy McCuskey on board as statewide field director. Wendy has previous West Virginia campaign experience, having worked as part of the 2004 President Bush re-elect and during the 2006 legislative election cycle.

Wendy's responsibility is to assist in building Governor Romney's grassroots organization across West Virginia. She is hard working and professional, and has made an extremely positive impact with the campaign. If you're part of a local Republican organization in West Virginia, chances are you'll be meeting her soon.

The assignment of a full-time staff member to the state demonstrates the seriousness with which Governor Romney is taking West Virginia. Couple that commitment with the fact Governor Romney has visited the state nearly a half-dozen times in the past year, and I think you must come to the conclusion that Governor Romney feels as strongly about West Virginia as the President does.

The scheduling of the West Virginia Presidential Nominating Convention, along with West Virginia's competitiveness in the general election, makes the days of our state as a political backwater long gone. It's nice to see someone like Governor Romney working hard to earn our votes.

Christy Barnett Shines at Grant County Meeting

The Grant County Republican Executive Committee held a meeting to discuss the upcoming state Presidential Convention. Also in attendance were members of the Pendleton County Executive Committee.

The meeting opened with Christy Barnett explaining what was required of the county to send its members to the state convention. Members must be present in Charleston to vote as no proxies will be allowed. If the delegate cannot attend, then they may appoint an alternate.

Those wishing to be an at large delegate must register for that position prior to November 30th, with the state party in Charleston. If more people than the alloted number allows, then a county convention will need to be held between Jan. 1st and Jan. 14th. It was decided that Grant County would hold another meeting to finalize plans.

Christy went onto explain about the Potomac Highlands Republican Club and the upcoming dinner to be held on Nov. 3rd. Christy explained that the clubs primary function would be to provide support to Republican candidates and support functions. Many attending felt that an organization like this had been needed for along time and welcomed the support it would bring, and thanked Christy for all the hard work she has done for the party and the state.

County Commission told not to interfere by Mineral County Republicans

Last Thursday night, concerned by the results of a recent County Commission meeting, the Mineral County Republican Executive Committee passed a resolution presented by Rose Anne Maine, Mineral County Assessor.

Property Owner Rights and Economic Development Resolution

Whereas… The implementation of building codes, their fees and requirements would adversely impact the economy, cost of construction, property rights, and personal rights of the residents of Mineral County;

Whereas… The citizen homeowners and businesses are struggling as their property tax bills soar having an adverse effect on the economic development of Mineral County;

Whereas… The economy works best in a free market atmosphere free from government intervention and regulation;

Therefore let it be Resolved… That the Mineral County Republican Party urges the Mineral County Commission to oppose any additional tax or fee burden placed on the homeowners, businesses, and contractors of Mineral County;

Let it be further Resolved… That the Mineral County Republican Party urges the Mineral County Commission to oppose any additional requirements placed on building construction within Mineral County;

Let it be further Resolved… That the Mineral County Republican Party supports that building codes only be enacted by the people’s vote.

A fee is just another tax

Politicians try to avoid the word tax when ever they can. They like to use words like user fee, impact fee, license fee, etc, but let's face it is just another tax.

There is a movement in Mineral County to impose new taxes in the form of "fees," but we are smart enough to know these are just more taxes on an already over taxed population. Mineral County is one the highest taxed counties in the state, and we have little or nothing to show for it.

The latest assault on the tax payer is being pushed by those trying to stop new economic development in the county. There are now rumblings of sub-division impact fees in the county. The fees would be paid by the developer, which in turn will tag the fees on the price of the land raising the cost to the end purchaser. That additional cost of the property will be recorded as part of the assessed value, and the new land owner will pay property tax on that piece of property forever. It is away for the county government in increase the taxes on everybody, and slide it in under the radar.

It is not just user fees that cause property assessed value to increase to benefit the coffers of the county. Additional unnecessary requirements put on the developers in the name of progress, do little more than increase the taxes on the end land user. The politician likes pretend that the develop pays these for these requirements and fees, but that couldn't be farther from the truth.

Let's look at what really happens; A developer purchases 10 acres of land, and wants to put in 10, one acre lots. He plans to sell each lot at $20,000 per lot. The county comes in an puts in a $10,000 impact fee, and requires the developer to put in an unnecessary storm water run off pond for an additional $10,000. The developer simply divides $20,000 by 10 = $2,000. He then adds the $1,000 to each $20,000 lot making them $22,000 lots.

The person that purchases the lot pays for the impact fees and the pond, not the developer as the county politician claims. Not only does the new land owner pay the impact fee, but he pays tax on the additional assessed value forever, and has to live with the mosquito's that breed in the unnecessary pond.

Addition fees and requirements are just another way for politicians to raise taxes on the taxpayer, and call it something else. Mineral County cannot afford any additional taxes, even if they call them fees.

The Death of Down Time

“By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work” Genesis 2:2

Even God rested after the work week. But in our current culture we never seem to let our minds rest. There is so much noise from work, writing blogs (thanks Gary), TV, radio, mp3 players, more TV, video games, social activities and so on that we never actually stop to just rest. It is no wonder that children are being diagnosed with ADHD and a host of acronym labeled problems. Might the challenge for kids be that they are so filled with noise and distractions from the day they are born that they don’t know what to do with themselves if they aren’t “plugged in” to something? Might some of the hyper active kids be better off if we can teach them how to let themselves rest?

When buying our mini-van, my wife and I made a point of not getting one with a built in entertainment center. We have a DVD player that works in the car on long trips of at least 2 hours or more. Anything less, no TV, no DVDs. My daughter loves the DVD player, but she is also very well behaved (for a 14 month old) on shorter trips. If need be, we give her a little childrens book that she flips through, or she watches traffic and the people around us.

I was recently in the high school here in Keyser around 1:30pm. There were kids hanging out in the lunch room, some football players watching game film, some wandering around the halls. All were either chatting with their peers, listening to music, or watching TV. I didn’t take a full tour but I wonder if the library was empty? What would be wrong with teaching the kids to sit and study quietly, or to read, or to simply sit and think in a quiet space? I used to love study halls because it meant I wouldn’t be bothered by anyone. Most of my peers seemed to hate it, almost as though they were afraid to be alone with their own thoughts. They wanted to be on the computer, listen to music, chat, etc. Too few people take time to adequately let their minds and bodies rest and recharge. Could it be that most of us don’t know how?

My wife and I joke that we just learned how to vacation, but it is true. On our honeymoon, we didn’t relax until the last day. We were simply trying to fill our days with activity. By the time we took a Baby moon to Hawaii, we knew how to relax, but it still took about 3 days for our minds to let go of everything else in our lives and let us relax. By that third day, we would wake up, feed the birds, snorkel a little, then hang out by the pool and read or do nothing. We had several days we didn’t even leave the hotel. When we came back, we were rested, relaxed, and more productive then ever. On a recent trip to OBX, we were in vacation mode the second we arrived.

By writing this I simply want to encourage everyone to take some down time. What is better, going through 7 days a week at 70-80% of your productive level, or taking one or two days to rest, gather yourself, and operating at 95-100% for the other 5-6 days? I will guarantee one thing, you will look forward to your days of rest, perhaps to the point that you no longer feel depressed about the other 5-6 days of work each week. God Bless

Eating Our Own

In addition to being a conservative, I'm a member of the West Virginia Republican Party. In fact, I currently serve as one of the party's Vice Chairmen, a regional political director for the upcoming State GOP Convention, and as Chair of the state party's Audit Committee. I've been actively involved with the state party since early 2001, and from that vantage point I have seen Republican party politics in West Virginia up close.

One of, if not the overriding, reason members of our party do not constitute a majority of elective officers in this state is that we eat our own. Republican primary elections are notorious for their divisiveness, and I always--always--go into a primary election cycle with the feeling of a pit in my stomach. This cycle is no different.

Why can't Republicans in West Virginia conduct a primary election campaign free of the kind of ugliness that divides the party for the general election? Why do some Republican campaigns seem intent on driving their party brethren onto the sidelines for the general election? The fact is, we are too small a group, in too small a state, to survive the kind of infighting that has marked us in the past.

Is there no such thing as good faith disagreement any longer? Are our intra-party opponents in a primary campaign to be dismissed simply as "drinking the kool-aid" if they support one candidate over another? Are we to trash another candidate based upon what church he attends? Or another based on whether he's divorced?

I'll be clear; this isn't just an internal Republican problem--there are too many instances of bad faith in politics; the current manufactured controversy over Rush Limbaugh is a prime example of bad faith opposition.

But keeping it in the Republican house, I think we've been so marginalized over the years--so politically abused and mistreated--that we've become conditioned to think that a victory in the primary is the best we can hope for. Like a line from the film "Braveheart" -- perhaps we are so used to eating the scraps from the table that we've forgotten we have a right to something better.

As the primary heats up, as we move toward the convention and the grassroots organizations begin to fill out and compete for delegate votes, I hope that every Republican involved with a campaign will think about the fact that the winner--whomever he is--will need every, single, last person affiliated with any of the Republican primary contenders if he expects to win in November, 2008. We're facing enough of an uphill climb as it is without driving away future supporters for after the primary.

I would hope that we would have learned better by now.

A President That Can Unify America

One president is capable of uniting America's diverse social and cultural groups. That president is Iranian strongman Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Today he will stop at New York City's Columbia University to give a speech. If it is like most of his other ones it will say absolutely nothing of real substance. If he is smart, he will leave Holocaust denials and other known beliefs at home.

Many people are arriving to hear him speak, ask him questions, and protest and almost zero support him. Not only Jewish groups, but also conservatives, gays, Christians, and others have lined up to see and confront this individual. Can anything in the American body politic produce such a reaction? Absolutely not.

Most groups on the right and left in American politics are much closer to each other than to the brand of hatred practiced by this man. His loathing of Israel and denials of the Holocaust are as well-known as his nuclear ambitions. And now Ahmadinejad seeks to score points by showing up the United States by speaking on our soil. As of right now he plans to defy the New York City Police Department and go to Ground Zero. New York City's hostile reception will likely not make Iran's censored news, and probably not even Al Jazeera. However when he leaves, hopefully he knows full well where America stands when it comes to his hateful brand of diplomacy and politics.

As for unity, it is something often called for by our politicians, but rarely seen. This is not a negative. Iran's people must demonstrate unity or they receive punishment. In America we all have the right to speak freely on our political points of view without fear of reprisals. This diversity of opinion makes us stronger because those that can speak freely in a political system usually feel no need to act violently. Someday the mullahs of Iran will be overthrown and called to account for their crimes against those people.

The Holocaust, Slavery, and Coal Mining

The war over West Virginia's coal mining history remains alive and well, evidenced by some sharp reaction to Russ Sobell's book Unleashing Capitalism.

Delegate Bill Hamilton (R) Upshur, criticized a chapter in the book that argued for a revised look at the historical memory of coal miners' experience. The chapter contended that the fluidity of the labor market required most operators to treat their workers with decency and that company stores were not predatory operations. This conflicts with the memory of Hamilton's father, a coal miner, who related stories about bad treatment and corrupt practices to his children. Hamilton goes further to claim that Sobell's book is comparable to Holocaust denials and mitigating accounts of American slavery.

Hamilton is correct to raise questions about this chapter in Sobell's book. Social and other pressures placed upon these workers exceeded the economic. One can still see in at least one old coal town the Gatling gun mounts on the porch rail of the boss's house. The practices of the Baldwin and Felts Detective Agency are also well known and recorded. That being said, Sobell's numbers do raise questions and tend to enhance, not detract from, the overall historical debate. History ought never shy away from a serious attempt to examine the past even if it conflicts with accepted beliefs.

That being said, even mentioning these abuses in the same breath as slavery or the Holocaust diminishes the horror of these two events. Yes coal miners were exploited and abused in especially Southern West Virginia. However most "agitators" found themselves blacklisted or physically tossed out. Residents of coal towns were deprived of constitutional rights. That being said, system did not systematically deprive these people and their families of their liberty for the purpose of coercing labor or murdering them. Bringing it to the same level as slavery or the Holocaust is a rhetorical mistake.

Reagan-Eisenhower Dinner Scheduled for Novermber 3rd

Just a note to let everyone know that The Potomac Highlands Republican Club will be holding the second annual Reagan-Eisenhower dinner on Nov. 3rd at 6pm, in Romney at the Loy Foundation (former Coke Bottling Plant), 426 East Main St., Romney, WV 26757

Guest speakers are:

• Secretary of State Betty Ireland
• WV Director for Fred Thompson for President Gary Abernathy
• State Senator Clark Barnes
  
• State Senator Dave Sypolt.

Tickets are on sale now $25.00 per person.

Christy Barnett can be reached by email texanyankee1@yahoo.com or 304-790-0522
Steve Smoot at 304-788-1573 or smoot.stephen@gmail.com

Hope to see everyone there!

Christy Barnett

The American GI: Our secret weapon

I had the opportunity to speak with an Iraq/Afghanistan veteran. The young man stopped by my store to pick up some parts. He explained he had been a mail order customer of mine in Germany when he was stationed there.

I immediately thanked him for his service to his county. I think we all should thank any person who is serving or has served his country every time we meet one for it is they that give us our freedom.

He spoke about how his grandmother wished all our troops could leave now from Iraq. He told me he explained to her that if we did it would all fall apart, and all the sacrifice that had been made would have been for nothing. He also stated that he explained to his grandmother that we have been in Germany for 62 years since the war ended. This young man who had been on the front lines sees the big picture that the Harry Reids of the world can not see.

His thoughts turned to locals he has interacted with. He talked about children that had nothing hanging around outside the camps and fire bases of Iraq and Afghanistan. Many without shoes or proper clothes. The GI's would give them candy, food and discarded items.

It brought to my mind the GI's through history. Whether it be the GI's in the UK during World War II giving the kids candy, because they had none due to sugar rationing or the film of the young Japanese kid shivering with fear on Okinawa as a US Marine gave him his canteen to comfort him. The candy bombers of the Berlin Airlift. Through Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, etc. the American GI's just being themselves win the hearts and minds of the next generation.

America's true secret weapon is the GI. Not because they are the best fighting force in the world (and they are by far), but because they represent America. Whether from the city or the country they are fair minded and are willing to lend a hand to those in need. GI's have a big American heart. Many of those kids that were given candy will remember when they are older and somebody says America is bad that is not true, because they have met true American's.

Dignity

During George Washington's first term as president, his old friend Governor Morris of New York came to the capital city to visit. Washington's close adviser, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, met Morris on the street. Morris asked where he could find Washington, who happened to be strolling away from them down the street as they spoke. Hamilton told Morris that President Washington would like nothing better than for his old pal to come up behind him, slap him on the back and jovially greet him.

Morris did just that, earning a stare from Washington that must have frozen his very soul. Washington then walked on without a word. When he looked back at Hamilton, he saw his fellow New Yorker laughing uproariously at the practical joke he just pulled. George Washington understood that as president an individual must show not only ability, but also dignity.

Where has that dignity gone? The Democratic presidential candidates seem to have lost all pretense to it, subjecting themselves to online debacles. Questions are asked in ridiculous ways. Certainly the famous "boxers or briefs" question posed to Clinton was a milestone in the loss of respect for the presidential office, then again so was the scandal of Watergate.

That being said, dignified is as dignified does. Despite the avalanche of satire, most of it extremely trite and shallow, directed at the current president, few can argue that George W. Bush does not handle himself with dignity. He expects respect and gets it as well as any president in the past hundred years. The Republican frontrunner's Fred Thompson and Rudolph Giuliani have acted similarly, not exposing themselves to silly requests. Credit Hillary Clinton with at least looking uncomfortable in the situations in which the Democrats expect her to perform.

Certainly we must expect our presidents to conduct themselves with strength. We must also understand that a certain amount of personal dignity is necessary to maintain respect. These men and women are not here to sell used cars, but to lead the free world. Republicans understand this, Democrats at this point do not.

Cleaning Up

Last Thursday's meeting of the Mineral County Clean Up Committee showed major differences between the two sides over the proposed future ordinance.

The basic difference lies in the scope of the law to be written. Gary Howell and others have argued over a period of months for a tightly written and strictly defined law. The ideal law for the Howell side restricts the power of government. If a structure or the condition of a property affects the health and safety of neighbors then the county ought to have the authority to act. Just having a property that someone deems as "junky" should not be a basis for government action.

The law must respect the basic rights of property owners. It must not encourage using the government for the purposes of harassment. Substantial penalties for noncompliance, up to $100 per day, have been suggested. This penalty could violate the US Constitutional prohibition on excessive fines. It certainly would prevent most honest citizens from using a natural right of appeal when they might have a legitimate issue with enforcement. Any major fine ought not be assessed until the entire appeals process has been exhausted. Protections for the disabled, poor and elderly must be specifically included.

The opposing side calls for a broadly based law that assigns more power to the county government. Additional powers come from the construct of the law that leaves such terms as "overgrown vegetation" undefined. Without strict guidelines, such issues become very subjective depending upon the attitude of investigators and the Enforcement Board. Committee member Kolin Jan even suggested that when the appearance of a property offended a businessman from outside the region, that he ought to be able to file a complaint against the owner, citing an "adverse effect" on economic development. How many of us have properties that would meet the aesthetic standard of a big city businessman?

Another issue lies in the well-known fact that politicians do not always act in accordance with ethical standards or even the law itself. Members of the committee denied that reasonable and honest public officials would ever abuse this law. And they would not. Mineral County's current officials are honest and trustworthy people, but they will not always be in office. The history of West Virginia demonstrates that all too often, elected officials do not follow the law. West Virginia elected officials have been known to take bribes, misappropriate federal and state funds, commit voter fraud, intimidate witnesses, one even bit a citizen in the nose. With this record, citizens are wise to prevent much power from falling into government hands.

The cold fact is that those that want broad powers and sweeping language in this ordinance could win unless the public speaks. Citizens concerned about their rights need to inform committee members such as Gary Howell that they want their rights protected. Additionally, they need to let the county commission know how they feel. This government body will have final say over the creation of the law. I know a lot of folks are worried about this, they need to speak loudly and often between now and teh next meeting. Make your voice heard.

The Value of People Behind the Scenes

As we approach another important election cycle, we will hear more than we ever wanted to about the candidates. Their faces will dominate the news shows and their spin will consume endless advertising dollars. Candidates whether for president or county commission will travel all over, meeting people, discussing the issues. It's easy to forget that behind each candidate, organizing each campaign, are the men and women behind the scenes.

How does that candidate know the local history of some tiny little town? Why does it seem like another candidate has an amazing ability to discuss every conceivable issue? Of course the candidates themselves are usually pretty sharp. However even the best candidates need help.

Some operate firms that help advise candidates and organize their approach. They specialize in efficiency, publicity, and actually saving campaigns money. One such firm is Abernathy Strategies run by Gary Abernathy. Others volunteer to work for the party itself. Perhaps a lot of voters have not yet heard of New Creek resident Christy Barnett, but the West Virginia State Republican Party valued her tireless energy and organizational skill enough to name her to its State Executive Committee in the past year. Barnett has shown a strong ability to get politicians on the west side of the mountains (especially in Charleston) interested in this region. Without the unpaid labor of people such as Barnett, candidates will not enjoy success.

Just as important are the thousands of conservatives that care enough to play whatever part they can. Some trudge valiantly into areas such as the notoriously left wing Morgantown neighborhood of South Park to get belittled for hours. Others drive out country roads to pass out literature, spending a lot of dollars and hours because they care about their community, state, and country. This is why some get extremely disappointed when elected officials do not measure up; they didn't just get a vote, they got a huge measure of a person's time for a few months.

West Virginia's Republican Party is gearing up yet again for an exciting political season. This will be a tremendous year in terms of candidates for office at all levels. Mineral County, for example, is very lucky to have extremely experienced men and women running for Delegate and State Senate. Even as we give these hard working candidates their just due, we must also remember the people that work behind the scenes that make victory possible.

"Commedians" and Jesus

I had no idea who Kathy Griffin was until this week. Nor did I care. I still don't really care, but now I know who she is and maybe that is the whole point.

At an awards show recently, alleged commedienne Kathy Griffin went on a rant attacking of all people Jesus Christ. Predictably it made national news. Mission accomplished for Kathy Griffin, we all know who she is. Unfortunately the majority of Americans likely dislike her and will avoid whatever she does at all costs.

Every time a famous individual attacks Jesus Christ, they always come away looking silly. The fact that fools such as Griffin see Christ as a figure worthy of attack demonstrates the power He has. People such as this sad woman understand on some level the power of His influence, so they realize that attacking Christ buys them cheap attention.

As to the power of commedians, it is rare that anyone takes them seriously. It is rare enough anymore that modern comics get real laughs from real jokes. Instead they resort to statements that rely on shock value rather than genuine humor. The best commedians, such as Bill Cosby of an earlier time and "Larry he Cable Guy" today relate stories based on shared experiences. We understand Cosby's old (respectful) religious humor and stories of his family. Larry the Cable Guy taps into the shared experiences of rural life in America. CBS' 60 Minutes recently profiled him. They did a good job of showing just how confused the entertainment industry was about his success(of course his producer comes from West Virginia.)

Both of these comic figures share a definite confidence in their lives and performances. They are strong and (at least until Cosby's son died) fairly happy looking people. It also is not shocking that both tend to support more traditional American values. Other commedians, such as Griffin, share neurotic and depressed outlooks on life that may have something to do with their reliance on negativity and shock value.

When comedy is at its best, we are all in on the joke and we laugh. Shocking statements masquerading as comedy with no other discernable purpose reveal a shallow mind and a hollow spirit.

A National Energy Policy

Since the first oil crisis of the 1970 we have known that our Achilles Heal is energy. In the 30 plus years since the first crisis, the power has shifted back and forth between both parties. During that time neither party has come up with a viable solution. Recent statements from the governor show that has not changed. "I've spoken to most of the presidential candidates on both the Republican and Democratic sides," Governor Joe Manchin stated at the Bluefield Coal Show. "They know what I'm saying. But none come out with a true energy policy."

West Virginia has coal, gas, wind, and water to generate energy for the nation. If a lead is not going to be taken anytime soon on a national level, then the state must step forward and take the lead. We should be reforming our laws to allow easier construction of modern power plants that will use West Virginia coal to produce power in the state and provide much needed jobs in the state.

The political landscape of West Virginia hurts the very industries that we need to grow. The current system put in place by the Democratic controlled WV Legislature holds back our economic growth. We must reform the legal and tax structure to encourage growth in the energy producing industries. In its current form, the WV legislature will not make the necessary changes to bring economic growth to this sector. We need to make some serious changes in West Virginia and take advantage of our strong points, or we will continue to fall behind the other states.

New York City's Ninja Bandit Would Have a Short Career in West Virginia

Fox News reported September 25th on a crime wave striking fear into the lives of residents of Staten Island. Apparently a man enters homes dressed as a ninja, assaults residents with numchuks, and steals their property. Some have been slightly injured, but it is unknown whether the level of violence will escalate. The "Ninja Bandit" has struck seventeen separate homes.

Does anyone think that this man would strike seventeen different homes in West Virginia? Probably not. Bringing numchuks to a gunfight is not a prudent measure. As a matter of fact the ninja bandit would probably find some better way of spending his energy.

New York City for many years now, whether it be during Democratic or Republican administrations, has consistently discouraged law abiding citizens from owning firearms. The city government aggressively pushed for the legal right to sue gun manufacturers for the misuse of their product.

Has anyone ever suggested that automobile manufacturers be similarly treated if a driver is drunk, or uses the car for some illegal purpose? Absolutely not because it sounds ludicrous. However driving an automobile is considered a legal privilege, not a constitutional right. Despite the arguments of extremists, the Second Amendment exists so that armed citizens can protect themselves from dictatorial tyranny, their country from invasion, and their property from intruders. These rights extend back centuries in British and American law.

Gun rights' opponents have adopted what Stalin called "salami tactics," that is slicing away a little bit at a time. Gun rights groups such as the National Rifle Association are well aware of this and fight strongly any attempt to restrict our constitutional rights here. If we believe in freedom, we must all take a stand and support everyone's right to defend themselves with a handgun, if necessary.

After all, next time the ninja bandit strikes, it could be a vulnerable senior citizen. Without a handgun for protection, such a person would stand no chance against an intruder. If that happens, the victim's family can thank New York City leadership over the past few decades for aggressively tearing down their right to defend themselves

West Virginia GOP Convention Details

On what is being termed "Tsunami Tuesday", February 5, 2008, West Virginia Republicans will open a new chapter in the state's political life with the state's first-ever Presidential Nominating Convention. At the Charleston Civic Center, over 1400 delegates from across the state will gather to award a presidential candidate West Virginia's at-large delegates to the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

One significant milestone in the convention calendar was reached on September 1; ten candidates, including all four "first tier" candidates, registered with the West Virginia Republican Party to participate in the convention. Now, the process turns to delegate selection.

Delegates to the state convention are selected in three ways; first, all voting members of the State Executive Committee, including county chairmen, are delegates. Second, each county executive committee names 12 delegates from among their number to serve as delegates. If a county committee has less than 12 members, that committee may name others to fill those slots. Finally, each county is awarded additional delegates based upon the number of registered Republicans in the county, with a further bonus for counties where President Bush won a majority of the vote in 2004.

The delegates based upon Republican registration, and those based upon voting for Bush in '04, are elected by the public. The election of delegates by the public has two components; first, an on-line vote. If someone wishes to vote for their county's delegates on-line, they must contact state party headquarters in Charleston between October 1, 2007 and November 30, 2007 to register. They will receive a secure username and password to use when they cast their vote between January 1 and January 14, 2008. The second component to the vote is the optional "county caucus". The county chair in each county decides whether to have a caucus, at which Republicans can vote for the delegates from their county. The caucuses must be held between January 1 and January 15, 2008, and anyone who has registered to vote online is ineligible to vote at the county caucus.

If someone is interested in running for delegate to Charleston, they have to file a certificate of candidacy with the state party between November 1 and November 30, 2008 and pay a $25 registration fee. Those fees will in large measure cover the expenses of the convention. Candidates for delegate can declare a presidential candidate preference, in which case the preference will appear beside that candidate's name on the county ballot.

In all, the state convention format represents a dramatic departure from past methods of selecting delegates to the national convention. Gone are the days of endless primary ballots with the names of dozens--or more--who want to go to the national convention. This new method promises to be simpler, more interactive, and more rewarding to those campaigns who have the best organizational skills--not necessarily the most money.

Bring Back Insane Assylums As Soon As Possible

There are a lot of sick people out there. A lot. Just today the following headlines have appeared on the Fox News website.

Details Emerge in WVa Torture Case

Girl, 6, Hanged to Death Was Sexually Assaulted

Woman Attacked With Sword in Argument Over Puppy

That is just the tip of the iceberg. Sick and brutal crimes happen every day with increasing frequency. Our problem as a nation is that the criminal justice system can only punish these people after they commit crimes. Some crimes reflect a condition of addiction, others represent a cry for help. Many times, even the most brutal acts occur after the offender has repeatedly told people that they were sick and needed help.

Thirty years ago mental health advocates succeeded in transforming America's mental care system. Decades ago the mentally ill were sent to long term care hospitals such as those in Weston and Spencer. Often times care was below standards and treatment was spotty. On the other hand a large number of people received some kind of medical attention and were off the streets.

Advocates opened up the hospitals on the assumption that better medication and part time facilities could treat the mentally ill better. States more than willingly unloaded themselves of the burden of maintaining hospitals. Instead of leading to a better life for the mentally ill, these changes made their lives more hellish.

Sure states no longer maintain as many costly hospitals, but too many of the mentally ill wind up in jail. They know what they did was wrong so they do not qualify as criminally insane. Yet they are mentally ill according to the definitions of psychologists. We have seen an explosion of jail construction to house these people.

Not only do we incarcerate more mentally ill, we also see more of them simply wandering the streets. They lack a firm grasp on how to live a normal life, so their only option lies in wandering from shelter to shelter or living in a box. All too often many turn to lives of drug addiction and/or violence.

The mental health experiment has failed miserably. We must work to rebuild state hospitals so that we can get addicts, psychopaths, pedophiles, and other people dangerous to themselves or others off the streets and into facilities where they at least have a chance to change. This is not a foot in the door to socialized medicine, it only returns to an earlier mode of dealing with a major problem in society. Enough is enough. Get mentally ill people off the streets before they can rape children or murder for drug money.

But How Do You Replace Them?

That's the big question when it comes to the issue of ridding the United States of illegal labor. Businesses and activists both contend that illegal aliens' work in such industries as agriculture and meat packing are essential. Without the labor that works at such low incomes, America's food supply could be at risk.

Actually the presence of a group of workers laboring for such low wages undercuts the natural economic process. Let's take lettuce harvesting, for instance. Lettuce costs $1 per head, every single one picked by hand. Lately we have seen that laborers will occasionally contaminate lettuce by doing business better conducted elsewhere right there in the field. It is argued that this labor is absolutely necessary to get lettuce harvested and sent to market.

Reliance on cheap labor that works not only below prevailing, but also legal wages has retarded economic development. Now I am not equating illegal alien labor to slavery, that would insult the memory of those that had to live under that curse of stolen liberty. However in the case of the South, the entire region's industrial development stalled in part because it was cheaper to rely on slave labor than to try and develop efficient industrial solutions.

Many in agribusiness will try to maintain that the labor is essential. However, the cheapness of the labor has prevented the industry from mechanizing. You cannot tell me that two hundred years ago we could invent a machine to pick seeds from cotton balls, but we cannot invent today one that harvests lettuce. Research, development, and production of such machines would put American technicians, managers, salespeople, and many others to work while simultaneously reducing the overall cost of harvesting lettuce.

USA Today proclaimed on its front page today that immigrant groups are trying to put more intense pressure on lawmakers and business to legalize more aliens and to not cut off benefits. They are mobilizing for strikes and boycotts. So be it. Americans, most of whom have family ties to people that came here legally, are fed up with this issue. It is time to solve the problem. Cut off social benefits, and most importantly, jobs to those that are not here legally.

Romney Wins Michigan Republican Straw Poll

Mitt Romney, Republican candidate for President and former Governor of Massachusetts, won Sunday's straw poll of attendees at the Michigan Republican Leadership Conference at Mackinac Island. Governor Romney polled decisively ahead of other candidates for president, carrying nearly 40% of the vote.

The Results are:

Romney — 39.12%
McCain — 26.56%
Paul — 10.83%
Giuliani — 10.62%
F. Thompson — 7.15%
Huckabee — 2.55%
Hunter — 1.23%
Tancredo — 0%
Brownback — 0.31%

Give Washington, DC back to Maryland?

A recent article in the Baltimore Sun says that Washington, DC should be given representation in Congress. I disagree it should be given independent representation.

The District of Columbia is the nations capital and in 1791 when its location was decided it was also decided it would be independent of the states. Originally the District of Columbia was set up at a 10 mile by 10 mile section of land along the Potomac carved out of both Virginia and Maryland. Washington County, DC was located on the Maryland portion, and Arlington County, DC was located on the Virginia portion.

The people that choose to live in the District of Columbia know they give up certain rights by choosing to live in a Federal District instead of a state. Everybody currently living in the District live there by choice, so they are willing giving up those rights.

The founding fathers did not want any state to hold the capital of the nation. I still believe that is a good idea. If the citizens of the District of Columbia want representation in Congress, then I believe the choice is simple. On July 9, 1846 Arlington County, DC was returned to the state of Virginia from which is was carved. The people in Arlington were then represented in Congress as part of the state of Virginia.

The same could be done now to give the people of Washington, DC representation in Congress. Simply return the Washington County portion of the District back to Maryland. They would then have representation in Congress without creating new Senate and House seats.

But....Why???

Article Beyond Delay, The 22 most corupt members of Congress

Why are we continuing to elect such a man? Do we want this state to continue to be a state of dependency? Waiting for the next politician to dump a few dollars in the trough? What happens when the endless stream of cash runs out with the next election?

Why are conservatives still holding to their registration as Democracts? Does voting in the Democrat primary still outweigh the desire to make known that this state is a Conservative, family values upholding state?

How long will the great benefactor KKKeep funneling money in and right back out of our state?

Is it fair for an active politician to name any and every public structure after himself? Do I want to run against Robert C. Byrd when most of my constituents have to go into *** Byrd high scholl to cast a vote? Confused as to which Namesake High School I am referring to? Just take the Robert C. Byrd Highway system, exit at the Robert C. Byrd interchange, ask the kid on a field trip, in the RCB t-shirt standing at the statue of the Honorable Robert C. Byrd in the state house where to go. Am I the only person to wonder about the future of our state in the post-RCB era? And why is everything named after a politician who is still in office running campaigns every six years? How is that fair?

Serious questions awaiting some serious answers.

I was an auditor for ISR (Institute for Scientifc Research) as a Toothman Rice, PLLC staff member. Of course that was before the architectural marval they built next to the NASA facility in Fairmont, WV. By the way I was able to tour NASA's over-planned facility (I say that because a huge floor area was planned for super computers that were quickly reduced to 1/20th of the size alloted for the servers which equals empty, wasted floor space...thanks Mr and Mrs Tax Payer) that, according to my high level escort, was built, sold to WVU for $1 then leased back to NASA for annual rent (again, thank you Mr and Mrs Taxpayer, I hope you have budgeted for this and other projects like Jesse Jackson, Jr.'s "future" airport.

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.'s Airport Earmark , afterall, we are going to need those work-projects down the road to keep this economy rolling!). Feel free to re-read that last one to make sure you got it...I wrote it and had to re-read it several times.

What struck me most is that the charges cited in this article are likely considered IMMATERIAL. That means that the budget for said NON-profit is TOO BIG to worry about 10K here or 10K there. Under a pre-specified threshold, it didn' t warrant investigation. So, of course, twin 60 inch plasma TVs in the conference room were necessary for ISR, as were the EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE curtains in the CEO's office (of course they may have been twin 50 inch plasmas, not 60 inch as my memory seems to recall). Upon questioning, I was commended for being so thorough as to discover 3 plasma TV charges, but only 2 registered TVs, then the whole thing was ignored because one was "faulty" and, afterall, the price tag was not a material amount to be considered., even though it was probably half that of the average persons annual income for the are...per TV!!! Without any further evidence it was swept aside because, after all, it was immaterial.

Let me close with this question, how many immaterial charges does it take to make one material charge? (remember not to add them together because each incident is a unique occurence...!) Said another way, who is going to guarantee that the "State of Dependency" created by Senator Byrd and his fellow Democrats will continue when Mr Byrd decides to no longer serve as the Senator for our great state? Can a well-respected...er...uh...honest...er...uh...incorru...er uh...current member of Congress keep the dollars flowing? Let's start planning for the future of this state or we may no longer be "OPEN".

Taylor County Commission fighting TrAIL 500 kV line

In a meeting last Tuesday, the Taylor County Commission voted 3-0 to oppose the "Grafton Area Route", a proposed alternative route for the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line project -- a 500kV electric transmission line which will run from southwestern Pennsylvania to northern Virginia.

The "Grafton Area Route" proposal came about after local residents in Monongalia and Preston counties strenuously opposed the original proposed route of the line, which would cut through the Halleck and Gladesville areas of Mon and Preston County, respectively. The WV Public Service Commission's Consumer Advocate Division ordered an alternative route study, and the Grafton Area Route is the result of that study.

The Grafton Area Route would, generally, follow the route of the existing Ft. Martin-Pruntytown line. It would then cut through the Wickwire area of Taylor County, before meeting up with the Pruntytown-Mt. Storm line; the right of way for the Grafton Area Route would more or less parallel the existing line.

The Grafton Area Route, in every measurable way according to the study, will have a greater negative impact upon people and the environment than the original proposed route. For example, the Grafton Area Route may require the removal of at least one residence, while the original route does not threaten any structures. In addition, the Grafton Area Route will place the lines within 250 feet of nearly 100 residences, while the original route will similarly affect less than 50. Add to that the additional economic and environmental costs, and the Grafton Area Route appears to be an inferior choice to the original proposed route.

American Troops Continue Their Hard Work Worldwide (no thanks to the liberal media)

This week, Congress has grilled General David Petraeus, as well as other high level officials. Republicans have generally sought reassurance, as one put it, that there is light at the end of the tunnel. The expected announcement of troop cutbacks comes as welcome news, but war supporters increasingly call for some idea of when Iraq will be ready for us to leave.

Democrats of course came out with their knives sharpened. Many of them almost gleefully (including some of their presidential candidates) too the opportunity to criticize without offering their own ideas. This is all too familiar territory for liberals. They attack without offering solutions of substance. They know that running away won't deter America's enemies, but it's much more important to try and win the next election.

It is interesting that the liberal media hangs on the words of a few retired generals that have not set foot in Iraq if they are critical, but ignore the facts given by the guy that has been there doing the job.

Moving Iraq into the next phase will require a massive investment in intelligence capabilities. When President Jimmy Carter pulled many of our human resources off the ground in the Middle East, he destroyed decades of work. We still have not restored our former capabilities there and reap the consequences of that president's poor decision-making. America must invest the resources, but also demonstrate the willingness to allow the CIA enough latitude to do its job. We must be willing to let them do in real life what we expect them to do in the movies. Sometimes that requires harsh measures. That, however, is how we move Iraq forward towards a successful conclusion and remove most of our ground forces.

********************************************************************

You will never hear about these guys on the news either, but their hard work deserves a salute.

The USNS Comfort just concluded a week long deployment in Haiti. The medical relief ship has been deployed by the Navy on a tour of the Caribbean and some Latin American nations. In Haiti the ship's staff treated over 11,000 Haitian patients in one week. Throughout the tour thus far they have seen well over 70,000. A Naval Construction Battalion Maintenance Unit went ashore to repair water facilities and work on other community projects.

Not just in Iraq and Afghanistan, but in so many places around the world our men and women in uniform work, struggle, and sometimes sacrifice to improve people's lives.

Conservatives Need to Get Out in Front on Marriage

This week an Iowa judge struck down the state's ten year ban on homosexual marriage, creating the latest in a series of signals that gay marriage bans will soon be a thing of the past. The United States Supreme Court will likely rule these bans as unconstitutional as soon as it gets the next opportunity.

Gay marriage tends to split the conservative community. Social conservatives will support bans upon it whole heartedly while economic conservatives feel less comfortable in doing so. Democrats enjoy exploiting the fact that the party that wants government off the back of the people also seems to want to keep illegal a very personal issue.

Gay couples do need some sort of legal protection. They experience many of the same problems as heterosexual couples. Those enduring abuse or theft have a more difficult time finding legal remedies for their problems. However some object to the name marriage being applied to non traditional relationships

The problem can be solved with conservative philosophy. Conservatives want the government out of our lives as much as possible. The solution is to get government out of marriage entirely. The legal contract can be a civil union done before a magistrate or some other official. It applies to either form of coupling. Marriage would be the social and cultural event. This would mean that people could call their relationships marriages and not have to worry about government interference. Gays do not want the government legally saying they are not really married, others object to the government imposing a different interpretation upon them. Getting government out of marriage makes sense. It will also get one more time consuming issue off of the plates of state legislatures and courts.